Live data from Hacker News

Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

ai.meta.com

241–250 of 392 posts

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#241

Meta is in a weird spot. They caught up late to the game and instead of releasing llama as a chat bot they open sourced it, precisely because they lost the mind share. They thought chatbot is not their product and I am sure they are regretting it now. Mark is obsessed with becoming the android of something and he poured billions into the metaverse thinking he is first and failed. He then open sourced llama and wanted…

> He then open sourced llama and wanted to be the android of llms. Well the original llama did kick off the era of open source LLMs. Most original open source LLMs were based on the llama architecture. And look where we are now OSS modles are very close to frontier. It may not have benefitted Meta but it commoditizatised LLMs.

Hell, most of us are still using llama.cpp for inference in some form

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#242

This really reinforces the idea that the AI race and the Railroad Mania of the 19th century are very similar. So many different companies are going to have similarly powerful ai that there will be no moat around it and it will be cheap. They will never earn their investment back.

What people seem to miss is that they don't need to get the investment back from people, they will get it from machines.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#243

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They really weren't horrible. They were ~gpt4o, with the added benefit that you could run them on premise. Just "regular" models, non "thinking". Inefficient architecture (number of active out of total) but otherwise "decent" models. They got trashed online by bots and chinese shills (I was online that weekend when it happened, it's something to behold). Just because they were non-thinking when thinking was clearly t…

Nah I remember how disgusted I felt trying llama 4 maverick and scout. They were both DOA.. couldn't even beat much smaller local models.

failing non-stop at tool calls on top of that.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#245

This really reinforces the idea that the AI race and the Railroad Mania of the 19th century are very similar. So many different companies are going to have similarly powerful ai that there will be no moat around it and it will be cheap. They will never earn their investment back.

Nah. Everybody is talking about ai. Everybody is using it. It's by far the most popular new tool human beings are using currently. As popular as mobile phones or spoons. And maybe as disruptive as the steam engines. AI companies are becoming the largest software companies on the planet. Everything points into that direction. Trillions of dollars are waiting in the market to be collected.

Based on what? A lot of this is vibes and FOMO; just like any economic bubble.

There is no objective evidence of anything you’ve said. It isn’t even clear if AI has contributed positively to global economic growth. It reminds me a lot of the late 90s and the dot-com mania. Slapping a domain on a commercial would make your stock go up even if there was no substance to any of it.

The real shame is this mania drowns out serious, practical use cases because when the bubble collapses, the market will throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#246
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Give it a few years, or month. Tiny models are getting outrageously good

Exactly. We’ll see the cost of AI continue to drop. I was saying this for years about Tesla’s FSD - they finally had to give in and drop the price to stay competitive.

FSD still sucks ass compared to Waymo.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#248
post #165

Genuine question: Why release this the day after Mythos? It does not appear SOTA (just based on benchmarks). OpenAI will likely release Spud tomorrow.

That's a really good question, my sarcastic mind thinks that Anthropic rushed the Mythos announcement of fears of Meta stealing their thunder... (I guess someone leaked that, a LOT of anthropic folks are ex meta... so, you know) Just a speculation, I have no real knowledge about it.

I think Anthropic did the mythos announcement to undercut OpenAI’s upcoming next model announcement, not Meta’s.

Re: Muse Spark: Scaling towards personal superintelligence

#250
post #98

The hero image on the linked page, which consists of a muted teal background with the words "Introducing Muse Spark", weighs in at 3,5MB. I don't even...

"Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—e.g. article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. They're too common to be interesting." - Hacker News Guidelines https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Such complaints are valid for AI model releases, that tells us that they are not using their own models to test their own release pages.
Post reply on HN