Live data from Hacker News

Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

blog.google

241–250 of 593 posts

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#241

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

> The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now.

I dare say, the feel of photos from back then is much stronger than of the photos taken today. See e.g.:

https://plfoto.com/zdjecie/413363/bez-tytulu?from=autor/beak...

https://plfoto.com/zdjecie/619173/bez-tytulu?from=autor/beak...

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#242

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

Every time in human civilization there's a new technology, existing humans rail against it and want the Good Old Days back, existing children grow up to get used to it, the generation-to-be-born knows it as the normal baseline, then maybe future generations rediscover the past and take the best things about how things used to be without being held back by how bad they were. (see retro games made after retro games died)

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#243

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

This is the same argument illustrators made upon the invention of photography.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#244

These image gen models are getting so advanced and life like that increasingly the general public are being duped into believing AI images are actually real (ex Facebook food images or fake OF models). Don't get me wrong I will enjoy the benefits of using this model for expressing myself better than ever before, but can't help feeling there's something also very insidious about these models too.

Surely this is a problem that we will never be able to solve.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#245
post #229
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like the complete opposite is true. Artists aren't doing it for the money. With advanced tools like these they wouldve iterated much faster and created much grander designs. Art is about pushing limits of what's possible and AI just raises those limits.

The Sistine Chapel was a commission.

A very large fraction of everything we collect as great art marking our history was made on commission. The GGP is showing their complete ignorance of the history of art.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#246

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

Considering half of the memes are still rage comics drawn with MSPaint i'm kind of skeptical of this statement.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#247

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

People here like to say "Commoditize your Compliment" but to a company the size of google or amazon literally EVERYTHING is your compliment. Too bad no philosopher or political scientist or economist every thought about this stuff before or we might have some kind of plan to make the future less miserable and alienating.

> Too bad no philosopher or political scientist or economist every thought about this stuff before

I see what you did there and know exactly the political economist you are talking about, but if you Speak His Name, the shrieking hordes descend.

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, who gives a shit about culture, after all humanity doesn't really need it...

That's not the point, but okay. I'm simply pointing out the fact that there'd still be art, just not those pieces created by those specific people and the world would be just fine. Humanity would've fared okay if Nano Banana was created 500 years ago.

What would you have trained it on?

Re: Nano Banana 2: Google's latest AI image generation model

#249

I'm sure this has been written about but here's what happens long term - images are commoditized and lose their emotional appeal. Probably about half of us here remember photos before the cell phone era. They were rare, and special, and you'd have a few photos per YEAR to look back on. The feel of photos back then, was at least 100x stronger than now. They were a special item, could be given as a gift. But once they…

Every time in human civilization there's a new technology, existing humans rail against it and want the Good Old Days back, existing children grow up to get used to it, the generation-to-be-born knows it as the normal baseline, then maybe future generations rediscover the past and take the best things about how things used to be without being held back by how bad they were. (see retro games made after retro games die…

Yeah, pixel games are huge now.

But I think it's more because of growing up with it have now pc, money. Not because people rediscover pixel games.

Post reply on HN