Live data from Hacker News

How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

anuragk.com

241–250 of 266 posts

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#241

Super low latency inference might be helpful in applications like quant trading. However, in an era where a frontier model becomes outdated after 6 months, I wonder how useful it can be.

Also, quant trading probably care more about embedding the content instead of generating output tokens

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#242
post #135
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm looking forward to the model.toVHDL() method in PyTorch.

Deep Differentiable Logic Gate Networks

I see you and I raise approximate logic synthesis [1] [2].

[1] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138376212...

[2] https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22772

You can synthesize a logic circuit that is as complex as it gets to have a certain accuracy.

Deep differentiable logic networks, in my experience, do not scale well for larger (more inputs) logic elements. One still has to apply logic optimization and synthesis afterwards. So why not to synthesize ones own approximate circuit to the accuracy one's desire?

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#243
post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And computers used to be the size of a room. I think they can get it to iPhone size in the future, this is an early prototype.

That's the part that people are missing: it won't get smaller. It already required heroic optimization to get 8B on one megachip. Taalas is more expensive but faster. It is cheaper per token when running 24x7 but not cheap to buy. It will never be small and never be cheap.

"It will never be small and never be cheap."

Will your comment age well? We'll see.

We might all be surprised if (somehow, ternary logic?) models come down drastically in size. It doesn't have to be the hardware getting more dense.

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you thinking about phones specifically? Most heavy users are on laptops and workstations. On smartphones there might be a few more innovations necessary (low latency AI computing on the edge?)

Many laptops and workstations also fell for the NPU meme, which in retrospect was a mistake compared to reworking your GPU architecture. Those NPUs are all dark silicon now, just like these Taalas chips will be in 12-24 months. Dedicated inference ASICs are a dead end. You can't reprogram them, you can't finetune them, and they won't keep any of their resale value. Outside cruise missiles it's hard to imagine where s…

Most consumers do not care about reprogramming or fine-tuning and have no idea what NPU is. For many (including specifically those who still mourn dead AI companions, killed by 4o switch) the long term stability is much more important than benchmark performance of evergreen frontier model. If Taalas can produce a good hardwired model at scale at consumer market price point, a lot of people will just drop their AI subscriptions.

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#245
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When output is good enough, other considerations become more important. Most people on this planet cannot afford even an AI subscription, and cost of tokens is prohibitive to many low margin businesses. Privacy and personalization matter too, data sovereignty is a hot topic. Besides, we already see how focus has shifted to orchestration, which can be done on CPU and is cheap - software optimizations may compensate ha…

Taalas is more expensive than NPUs not less. You have GPU/NPU at home; just use it.

I feel weird defending Taalas here, but this argument is quite strange: of course it is more expensive now. It is irrelevant - all innovations are expensive at early stage. The question is, what this technology will cost tomorrow? Can it do for consumers what NPUs could not, offering good UX and quality of inference for reasonable price?

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#246
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Taalas is more expensive than NPUs not less. You have GPU/NPU at home; just use it.

I feel weird defending Taalas here, but this argument is quite strange: of course it is more expensive now. It is irrelevant - all innovations are expensive at early stage. The question is, what this technology will cost tomorrow? Can it do for consumers what NPUs could not, offering good UX and quality of inference for reasonable price?

It will always be more expensive.

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#247
post #59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hm yeah I guess if they stick to shitty models it works out, I was talking about the models people use to actually do things instead of shitposting from openclaw and getting reminders about their next dentist appointment.

Considering that enamel regrowth is still experimental (only curodont exists as a commercial product), those dentist appointments are probably the most important routine healthcare appointments in your life. Pick something that is actually useless.

If you need a full blown llm with root access to all your devices to remind you about an appointment something is very wrong with your life.

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#248
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To run Llama 3.1 8B locally, you would need a GPU with a minimum of 16 GB of VRAM, such as an NVIDIA RTX 3090. Talas promises a 10x higher throughtput, being 10x cheaper and using 10x less electricity. Looks like a good value proposition.

What do you do with 8b models ? They can't even reliably create a .txt file or do any kind of tool calling

Exploration, summarization, classification, translation

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Many laptops and workstations also fell for the NPU meme, which in retrospect was a mistake compared to reworking your GPU architecture. Those NPUs are all dark silicon now, just like these Taalas chips will be in 12-24 months. Dedicated inference ASICs are a dead end. You can't reprogram them, you can't finetune them, and they won't keep any of their resale value. Outside cruise missiles it's hard to imagine where s…

Most consumers do not care about reprogramming or fine-tuning and have no idea what NPU is. For many (including specifically those who still mourn dead AI companions, killed by 4o switch) the long term stability is much more important than benchmark performance of evergreen frontier model. If Taalas can produce a good hardwired model at scale at consumer market price point, a lot of people will just drop their AI sub…

> a lot of people will just drop their AI subscriptions.

For a 2.5 kW Server? I don't see it happening, your money and electricity is better spent on CUDA compute.

Re: How Taalas “prints” LLM onto a chip?

#250

[dead]

No, not in milliseconds if you have longish context. Prefill is very compute heavy, compared to inference.

Depends how you’re defining it. There can be a lot of it to ingest so it’s a lot of compute in absolute terms. It’s also much more memory efficient since it’s batchable so, it’s more likely to be compute bound, but you can also throw a lot of resources at the problem. But in terms of time generation can be significantly more expensive since it’s slower and you can’t batch (only use a draft model)
Post reply on HN