Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?
"A better way is to self host". [0]
241–250 of 425 posts
Is it really that much better than alternatives to justify these constant outages?
"A better way is to self host". [0]
Oh! It's not my GitLab@Hetzner that's not working, it's GitHub. Just when I decided to opensource my project.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
have you considered moving or having at least an alternative? asking as someone using caddy for personal hosting who likes to have their website secure. :)
We can of course host our code elsewhere, the problem is the community is kind of locked-in. It would be very "expensive" to move, and would have to be very worthwhile. So far the math doesn't support that kind of change. Usually an outage is not a big deal, I can still work locally. Today I just happen to be in a very GH-centric workflow with the security reports and such. I'm curious how other maintainers maintain…
As an alternative, I thought mainly as a secondary repo and ci in case that Github stops being reliable, not only as the current instability, but as an overall provider. I'm from the EU and recently catch myself evaluating every US company I interact with and I'm starting to realize that mine might not be the only risk vector to consider. Wondering how other people think about it.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder who left the team recently. Must be someone bagged with shadow knowledge. Or maybe they send devops/devs work to another continent.
They're in the process of moving from "legacy" infra to Azure, so there's a ton of churn happening behind the scenes. That's probably why things keep exploding.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you want to go really minimal you can do raw git+ssh and hooks (pre/post commit, etc).
i would imagine that's what everyone is doing instead of sitting on their hands. Setup a different remote and have your team push/pull to/from it until Github comes back up. I mean you could probably use ngrok and setup a remote on your laptop in a pinch. You shouldn't be totally blocked except for things like automated deployments or builds tied specifically to github.com Distributed source control is distributable.
GitHub has had customer visible incidents large enough to warrant status page updates almost every day this year ( https://www.githubstatus.com/history ). This should not be normal for any service, even at GitHub's size. There's a joke that your workday usually stops around 4pm, because that's when GitHub Actions goes down every day. I wish someone inside the house cared to comment why the services barely stay up and…
It's 100% because the number of operations happening on Github has likely 100x'd since the introduction of coding agents. They built Github for one kind of scale, and the problem is that they've all of a sudden found themselves with a new kind of scale. That doesn't normally happen to platforms of this size.
There are probably tons of baked in URLs or platform assumptions that are very easy to break during their core migration to Azure.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
have you considered moving or having at least an alternative? asking as someone using caddy for personal hosting who likes to have their website secure. :)
> have you considered moving or having at least an alternative Not who you're responding to, but my 2 cents: for a popular open-source project reliant on community contributions there is really no alternative. It's similar to social media - we all know it's trash and noxious, but if you're any kind of public figure you have to be there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
have you considered moving or having at least an alternative? asking as someone using caddy for personal hosting who likes to have their website secure. :)
You are talking to the maintainer of caddy :) Edit- oh you probably meant an alternative to GitHub perhaps..