Live data from Hacker News

Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

dell.com

241–250 of 370 posts

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#241
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For context - this 51" monitor has 22% less pixels than the 32" Apple Pro Display XDR.

Not really. The Dell is 6144x2560 @ 1x while the Apple is effectively 3008x1692. The Dell can fit much more content on the screen.

macOS can specify regions of the screen to be 1x. If I'm using Capture One or Lightroom, my photos are at normal resolution while the UI elements are "retina/2x".

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#242
post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really. The Dell is 6144x2560 @ 1x while the Apple is effectively 3008x1692. The Dell can fit much more content on the screen.

macOS can specify regions of the screen to be 1x. If I'm using Capture One or Lightroom, my photos are at normal resolution while the UI elements are "retina/2x".

So you can see more detail but you aren't fitting more photos on the screen.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#243
post #157

I have 3 27" 5k monitors in portrait and a 32" 4k horizontal above those. It is all mounted with vesa cheeseplates to manfrotto magic arms on t slot aluminum attached to a C stand with manfrotto super clamps. I also have two genelec studio monitors which sound amazing. All of that cost less than this one monitor.

And you can get at least 10x 24" 1080p monitors for the price of a single 5k monitor.

Being on the leading edge of tech costs money.

That said, your mixmatched PPIs would drive me nuts.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#244
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get bonkers annoyed using just two monitors with macos or windows. multi monitor management... nothing behaves how i want it to, apps never open where they should etc etc. I havent tried it on desktop linux enough to know if it's any better - maybe at least id assume have the most configuration control on linux. How do you do it? I always give up in frustration. 100% would keep the genelecs :)

I can only speak for the Cinnamon desktop environment on Linux Mint, but it’s very simple: - Apps always launch on the monitor your mouse cursor is on - Switching the focused window to the other monitor is Win+Shift+Arrow Keys So if I clicked to open an app, it’s on the monitor I’m already looking at. If I used a keyboard shortcut, win+shift+arrow is super easy and simple. The fact that it’s a stupid simple rule mean…

>Apps always launch on the monitor your mouse cursor is on

...but you can set up rules to force a given program to always launch at a specified position and dimension.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#245
post #193
post #157

I have 3 27" 5k monitors in portrait and a 32" 4k horizontal above those. It is all mounted with vesa cheeseplates to manfrotto magic arms on t slot aluminum attached to a C stand with manfrotto super clamps. I also have two genelec studio monitors which sound amazing. All of that cost less than this one monitor.

I get bonkers annoyed using just two monitors with macos or windows. multi monitor management... nothing behaves how i want it to, apps never open where they should etc etc. I havent tried it on desktop linux enough to know if it's any better - maybe at least id assume have the most configuration control on linux. How do you do it? I always give up in frustration. 100% would keep the genelecs :)

On linux i3 I've bound my workspaces to default to a monitor and my apps to default to a respective workspace. Very very productive

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#246
post #117
post #21

This has pixels the size of my hand, and it fully covers my field of view. Not my cup of tea. What I do recommend (having bought one) is the Kuycon G32p, 32 inches @ 6K. Incredible quality and unbelievable value for money ( https://clickclack.io/products/in-stock-kuycon-g32p-6k-32-in... ).

> pixels the size of my hand Sometimes this is refreshing. (display joke there, heh) this is a big monitor. Many UIs don't scale particularly well with very high resolution. So you get UI elements with super-fine text or icons. Some linux console fonts are almost unreadable with just 4k, though recent releases seem to be addressing this. also old games. for comparison, I think this is basically the dell 43" monitor w…

There's an awkward zone where scaling doesn't work well. But if you have a screen that can do nice high levels of detail, then you can run older UIs at exactly 2x and they will look just as good as they ever did. An Apple Pro display is a good fit here, offering 218 pixels per inch compared to a "traditional" 96.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#247

1. I don't think I'll ever buy Dell again. My current monitor is a Dell S3221QS 32" screen and it has vertical lines and starts flickering on both the Macbook M1 and the Mac Studio with the M4 Max chip after some time, which is a known issue[0][1]. It also defaults to YPbPr colors rather than RGB/SRGB, so the colors look off. I'm using HDMI to HDMI connectivity currently. Part of it is also my fault as I thought a mo…

Counter-anecdata: I have 2 Dell U2720Q (Ultrasharp 27") bought in 2021 and they've been great. That said, I've always stuck for Dell's upper-range Ultrasharp (U prefix in models) monitors, being slightly wary of their cheaper series which the S in your S3221QS implies.

I’ve been a big fan of the big dell curved displays. The U4025QW has been a solid single monitor

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#248
post #203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> everything is scaled way too large The HiDPI/Retina bullshit is just bullshit. I've been running a 4K 43" 4:3 display at 100% scaling since 2018. It is neither blurry nor scaled too large. It can, however, comfortably fit 10 A4 pages simultaneously. Or 4 terminals + a browser + a PDF reader.

My arithmetic nodule is having a konniption fit. Does not compute. If this is 16:9 and you mistook your aspect ratio I can breathe again. √2:1 says 1.41:1 isn't 1.33:1 10 A4 pages do not fill a 4:3 or 3:4 aspect ratio box. They don't fill a 16:9 box either but it's more plausible, the wastage is different.

[dead]

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#249
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The freakin stand alone is $1300 CAD. What planet are those people on? That's Gucci bag territory. They can take their res and shove it, that's almost NINE GRAND (granted, Canadian pesos) for a freakin display! Who is this for, just Pixar employees?

And how much do you think the Humanscale mount costs that you would otherwise use? The Pro Display XDR is too heavy for a $30 Amazon Basics mounting arm or anything similarly cheap.

If you’re suggesting the only way to mount a display of that weight drives you into that price territory, that’s just ridiculous.

There’s huge monitors from other companies that come with mounts that handle more weight than that. Granted, it’s not some art deco CNC monstrosity.

I think the sibling comment nailed it: this is just a status symbol.

Re: Dell UltraSharp 52 Thunderbolt Hub Monitor

#250
post #238
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

All the brand naming makes this read like something from American Psycho.

The brand names are there, I assume, to show that it's not some cheapskate setup jerry-rigged from salvaged parts. Because even then it's still less expensive that the giant Dell monitor. I frankly don't understand the point of such monitors. If they are placed reasonably near, they don't fit human FOV well, and the periphery is seen distorted. If they are far enough away, the pixel pitch goes well past the angular r…

I got the 49" version of the dell Alienware display (basically this one size down with different branding and stand)... . From my perspective you're looking at it incorrectly, the point isn't to be able to look at everything at the same time, it's to be able to quickly glance from the one side to another.

Let's say I have an ide open, I will likely not look at the directory structure often, but I want an easy way to switch files - fantastic for having it available just by glancing over

Now you run tests, start the application etc. It also doesn't need to be in your view, all the time - but isn't it convenient to be able to just look where you know it's?

It's suboptimal for competitive gaming however, exactly for the reason you said. Scenic gaming on the other hand is improved by it, because the larger screen is more innersive

Post reply on HN