Anna's Archive loses .org domain after surprise suspension

Post by ddingus » Mon, Jan 05, 2026, 6:09 PM UTC

jacquesm wrote: post #135

mastermedo wrote: post #111

I still remember the hiatus around the pirate bay . org going down back in the day. They updated the landing page on the alternative domains to include a hydra above the pirate ship where above each hydra head there was a domain name[1]. I thought that was a great comeback by the maintainers. [1]: https://www.businessinsider.com/the-pirate-bay-has-a-new-log...

Those guys should get a prize for resilience alone, they put many government run services to shame. The only thing all this legal stuff seems to have done is to harden them even further.

Post by rockostrich » Mon, Jan 05, 2026, 6:10 PM UTC

andrepd wrote: post #3

delis-thumbs-7e wrote: post #2

https://annas-archive.se/ Works still

https://open-slum.org/

Post by gpm » Mon, Jan 05, 2026, 6:13 PM UTC

schmuckonwheels wrote: post #239

gpm wrote: post #210

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Having a sense of morality is not a problem. Good for them.

[flagged]

Post by metalliqaz » Mon, Jan 05, 2026, 6:17 PM UTC

lazzlazzlazz wrote: post #212

blell wrote: post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Kiwifarms is also a notable web site but they do not show a link to it. This means there is editorialisation going on.

[flagged]

Post by gpm » Mon, Jan 05, 2026, 6:20 PM UTC

schmuckonwheels wrote: post #248

gpm wrote: post #245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your point is that... Wikpedia editors choice to have articles about sex acts is morally inconsistent with a choice not to have direct links to a site a based around harassing, stalking, doxing, etc that has been directly tied to multiple suicides? I don't see the connection frankly. PS. English Wikipedia also does not appear to have an "Anal Creampie" article, let alone one with an animation.

[flagged]