Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code On-the-Go

granda.org

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

241–250 of 349 posts

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#241

Post by mwigdahl »

xyzzy123 wrote: post #156
bdangubic wrote: post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

- maternity leave - paternity leave - overtime - not having to answer a call or email outside of work hours - workman’s comp / short/long-term disability for issues with my back or wrists or eyes or… - about 100 more things

All those sorts of protections seem like they make sense for every worker rather than being "tech" specific. I do understand that collective bargaining could help with carving out sector-specific deals, though. I wonder if there is a difference in context that explains why we might disagree. I'm in Australia where I think it's politically easier to "add" broad top level protections for all workers than it would be in…

Yeah, the legal framework (Taft-Hartley) in the US is pretty explicit about banning general strikes and solidarity strikes. A union can organize within a single industry but not beyond that.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#242

Post by xd1936 »

kevmo314 wrote: post #21
xd1936 wrote: post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Did they say the same when Email took over? Or Slack?

Well yes, they did... For example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29201917

And yet it is still possible to maintain work-life balance, given the right job at the right business, even after the invention of email.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#245

Post by bakies »

roncesvalles wrote: post #162

There has been a sustained campaign over the last few days to push "I use Claude from my phone". I saw multiple posts on LinkedIn already, and now this. This blog is super sus too. All the posts are about Claude. I suspect it's run by Anthropic, just read the About page: https://granda.org/en/about/

I am not Anthropic. I have vibe-coded a web interface for claude code to use from my phone. It's very similar to Anthropic's, but has a couple more features that I wanted.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#246

Post by throwaw12 »

andrew_lettuce wrote: post #240
throwaw12 wrote: post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to propose a cap on net worth. Realistically, if you have 300M, you and your direct family are settled for life. So, I want to propose 1B cap on net worth, if its more than that for 12 months straight, surplus goes to government, if your net worth is down after that, government obliges to return it partially to make it to 1B. People, who are eager building things and innovating, will keep building regard…

This is so arbitrary and incredibly naive. How did you come to with 300M, why not 300k or 300 billion? How would you determine the worth of rare, illiquid or intangibles? What about wealth held in trusts or companies? How does the accounting work if I borrow against my wealth? What happens when things change value dramatically in a short period of time? And the government is going to "make billionaires whole again" i…

You are asking me about implementation difficulty, difficult implementation doesn't mean idea is not worth it.

One example:

* 300k vs 300M - doesn't matter if I said 100M, 200M, 550M, if you think 300M is not enough for you and your family to afford anything, not sure how other people are surviving for even less.

Here is why I think this is good:

1. Ambitious people will still be ambitious, its rare some genius kid says: I know this is 100B idea, but I won't build it, because I will only own 1B of it.

2. Limits the power, when power is really limited, people will be forced to focus on different things. For example, if you had plans to take over the world by making $10T and creating an army to kidnap president of another state you don't like, then you would know, it is not possible to make 10T, its not only about how much, its about suppressing hungry animal in you by capping your limits.

3. There is a chance "bad" ambitious people, will be converted to real philanthropist, because they know it doesn't matter to own more than 1B anyway and they can't own it.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#247

Post by bakies »

duckkg5 wrote: post #82

Why not just use the mobile app? It has Claude Code built in. Maybe I'm an unsophisticated idiot but it works well for me. Some shortcomings with repo management but other than that, CC mobile seems ... fine

I've built something similar to run in my own cloud to run my own container images and add some features. The Claude Code web app has been pretty buggy for me and I like to run these things myself. If I do run into bugs or issues I still have access to the containers (and I do, because I vibe coded the whole thing). I gave it service accounts to the cloud it's running in, where the CI builds take place and setup dev environments per PR that deploy automatically. This is a massive productivity boost imo.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#248

Post by bakies »

DanOpcode wrote: post #232

I wonder when/how to test and review the code though? I mean, how do you know Claude Code hasn't entered a completely different path than you had imagined?

I just tell it to open a PR when it's done. I check the diff, and I give it feedback.

I run it containerized with --dangerously-skip-permissions and let it run wild.

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#249

Post by throwaw12 »

sejje wrote: post #237
throwaw12 wrote: post #215

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would like to propose a cap on net worth. Realistically, if you have 300M, you and your direct family are settled for life. So, I want to propose 1B cap on net worth, if its more than that for 12 months straight, surplus goes to government, if your net worth is down after that, government obliges to return it partially to make it to 1B. People, who are eager building things and innovating, will keep building regard…

Would SpaceX exist if your ideas were in charge?

it would.

Some options why it should happen:

1. Assuming Elon is curious person, he will still build it out of curiosity.

2. Assuming Elon is not curios person, just power hungry, he will probably think its not worth building it, but someone else who is curious will build it eventually. This is even better, because when power hungry person owns such thing, they might use it for bad things as well (e.g. to gain more power, eventually interfering with elections, oh wait, it did already happen)

3. Government will build, because government will have more money now, but then we should be even more careful who gets to the top. Assuming people won't have more than 1B, maybe there will be less lobbying? because its not worth as much as it was before?

Re: Claude Code On-the-Go

#250

Post by isbvhodnvemrwvn »

lm28469 wrote: post #223
ryanjshaw wrote: post #195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> we live under a system that is arranged for the sole benefit of the owners of capital, and have been convinced that this is an immutable state of affairs What alternative do you propose?

The same but less rigged would be a good start. I feel like people ask your question as a gotcha because they can't wrap their head around a system more nuanced than "cancerous capitalism" or "potato famine communism" Something like we had in advanced western europe and the US between ww2 and the late 70s seemed much more balanced while not requiring a complete system change. Most people would be fine if we sprinkled…

Perceived success of 1950s and 1960s does apply to non-white people, women or countries destroyed by war.
Post reply on HN