When can people start going to jail for this kind of thing
Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
241–250 of 447 posts
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
No need to blame the user for the companies actions. Company enacts policy enforced on them by law, for example requiring proof that a user is above the age of 18 to be able to use a channel where other users may use naughty words (The Horror!!!). User struggles to use the automated age check system (I used the "guess age by letting an AI have a look at a selfie" method and it was a pain in the ass which failed twice…
> User, relying on the published policy that Discord will delete ID directly after being used to to the age check [1] decides they wish to remain to have communication with their online friends uploads their ID. This is the part where the user has to take at least partial blame. You have to be utterly stupid (or at the very least way too sheltered) to believe a statement like this from a company, especially when ther…
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#243I don't know if I just became cynical and jaded, but is this really surprising to anyone in any way? Any time I give out my personal information to anyone for any reason, I basically treat it as 'any member of public can now access it'. Even if a service doesn't have it in their TOS that they sell it to 3rd parties, they might do it anyway, or there will, sooner or later, be a breach of their poorly secured system. T…
Developer time is more valuable than user data. The market is being efficient.
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#244The whole "it wasn't us, it was our third-party vendor" line is getting way too common. If you're collecting government IDs for age verification, the security bar should be extremely high... no matter who's handling the data
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#245I don't know if I just became cynical and jaded, but is this really surprising to anyone in any way? Any time I give out my personal information to anyone for any reason, I basically treat it as 'any member of public can now access it'. Even if a service doesn't have it in their TOS that they sell it to 3rd parties, they might do it anyway, or there will, sooner or later, be a breach of their poorly secured system. T…
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#246How did we get to this state anyway?
Isn't HN supposed to be populated by the people who work at these companies, the fuck are you guys doing??
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#247What is the use case for uploading your government ID to Discord?
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#248I don't know if I just became cynical and jaded, but is this really surprising to anyone in any way? Any time I give out my personal information to anyone for any reason, I basically treat it as 'any member of public can now access it'. Even if a service doesn't have it in their TOS that they sell it to 3rd parties, they might do it anyway, or there will, sooner or later, be a breach of their poorly secured system. T…
It is a common misconception that facts are reported because they are surprising. Facts are reported because they are important. More and more governments are passing age verification laws which put exactly this data in to the hands of even more shady private companies. This breach serves as evidence that those laws are misguided, and spreading news of this event may help build public support for those efforts.
Without going too much off-topic: In a vacuum, you are right. In reality, facts are reported because they sell.
It is a good day when important facts like this one happen to coincide with what people what to know more about. (the recent UK attempt at stripping the rights of its citizens)
Tomorrow, people will have forgotten all about it, and the government can continue to expand its powers without anyone talking about it.
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#249You've got to be a complete moron uploading your gov ID to discord
You can do better than victim blame, and instead point the finger at Discord and whoever told the British government that delegating ID control to third-parties was a good idea.
Re: Discord says 70k users may have had their government IDs leaked in breach
#250I don't know if I just became cynical and jaded, but is this really surprising to anyone in any way? Any time I give out my personal information to anyone for any reason, I basically treat it as 'any member of public can now access it'. Even if a service doesn't have it in their TOS that they sell it to 3rd parties, they might do it anyway, or there will, sooner or later, be a breach of their poorly secured system. T…
> this is a systemic issue of governments not having/not enforcing serious security measures. To do so seems impractical. Imagine the government machinery that would be required to audit all companies and organizations and services to which someone can upload PII. Not tractable.