Live data from Hacker News

PuTTY has a new website

putty.software

241–250 of 304 posts

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#241
post #226
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have they fixed it spying on you? https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/terminal/issues/139

They probably meant conhost.exe (it gets you the regular console on Windows 11).

Fun fact: if you have Windows Terminal installed, it takes over `conhost.exe` and brings telemetry spying even to old apps which never had it before :D

https://github.com/microsoft/terminal/commit/906edf7002b8ccf...

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#243

From the PuTTY FAQ: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html#... Would you like me to register you a nicer domain name? No, thank you. Even if you can find one (most of them seem to have been registered already, by people who didn't ask whether we actually wanted it before they applied), we're happy with the PuTTY web site being exactly where it is. It's not hard to find (just type ‘putty’ into goo…

It seems almost hostile to users. Why should I need to use some third party tool to find your thing? If you're paying for a domain anyway, pay for a meaningful one. … Well, I guess that's what they've done. Surely nobody could ever have been this naïve, though; it's not as though Google massaging results into unusable mess is anything new.

> Why should I need to use some third party tool to find your thing?

How else would you find it? By typing domain name guesses into your address bar until you hit the right one? How would you be sure you've hit the right one and not a scammer/squatter?

This is not a particularly easy problem to solve, and I agree that relying on Google to accurately and safely deliver you to the correct web site isn't great either, but I think we'd be much worse off without search engines.

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hachyderm.io says it has a validated link to his homepage, but if you don't already trust hachyderm.io that means nothing.

If you check the source of the website that it links to [1], on line 168, we have this I'm on Mastodon as @simontatham@hachyderm.io . If you trust that website, then you can be sure that this Mastodon account is the right one. 1. https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/

Sure, but by the time you've verified that, you could also have just visited the PuTTY website (the old/current one) to verify that putty.software is legit.

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#245

From the PuTTY FAQ: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html#... Would you like me to register you a nicer domain name? No, thank you. Even if you can find one (most of them seem to have been registered already, by people who didn't ask whether we actually wanted it before they applied), we're happy with the PuTTY web site being exactly where it is. It's not hard to find (just type ‘putty’ into goo…

Unfortunately the person who owns putty.org started to use it to spread misinformation about vaccines and the pandemic, as you can see on the site today. This recently [1][2] got a lot of attention on the web and here on HN, along with a post on Mastodon from the author [3] I imagine trying to disincentivize this and provide another shorter more official looking link is the hope here. [1] https://www.theregister.com/…

    > Unfortunately the person who owns putty.org
    > started to use it to spread misinformation
    > about vaccines and[...]
Isn't that rather fortunate in the grand scheme of things? It could have been a landing page monetizing various SSH clients for windows.

Instead it's just some guy's website clearly unrelated to PuTTY. He's even gone out of his way to point people looking for PuTTY in the right direction. Who cares what his opinion is about anything else?

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#247

From the PuTTY FAQ: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/faq.html#... Would you like me to register you a nicer domain name? No, thank you. Even if you can find one (most of them seem to have been registered already, by people who didn't ask whether we actually wanted it before they applied), we're happy with the PuTTY web site being exactly where it is. It's not hard to find (just type ‘putty’ into goo…

I barely know what SSH keys are, but last week when I was asked to provide one for an stfp site at work they said create a pair using putty. Well I googled putty and found a couple different .org domains, one who which said it was legit but not official, and another which said it was official but looked wildly out of date. Neither one I could find a download for Mac that worked. The one I tried gave a scary “we no lo…

The wikipedia article has links to the official websites, and not to the scams: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/PuTTY

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#248

Simon Tatham's most important work is keeping its page: https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/ Try Mines, you never have to guess.

If you never have to guess there must be one more strategy to figuring it out I've never seen anyone mention, because I frequently get stuck with two options on the very hardest difficulty.

One non-obvious strategy is that the number of mines that are left on the field is known. Especially near the end, this can break a tie between two patterns of mines.

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My Terminal looks great! https://imgur.com/a/js6Yzxf

Looks like you’ve gone for something like the classic text mode 80x25?

More Perfect DOS with a CRT filter, to remind me of my handmedown MS DOS/Win95 PC from elementary school.

Re: PuTTY has a new website

#250
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately the person who owns putty.org started to use it to spread misinformation about vaccines and the pandemic, as you can see on the site today. This recently [1][2] got a lot of attention on the web and here on HN, along with a post on Mastodon from the author [3] I imagine trying to disincentivize this and provide another shorter more official looking link is the hope here. [1] https://www.theregister.com/…

Did putty.org once link to the putty software? Or an alternative SSH client? Why did the site ever become popular? I'm trying to grok this, but all of the posts sort of obliquely refer to things that happened in the past (even the old HN links here), rather than explicitly just explain what the hell happened.

It used to link to Putty _and_ to the domain owner's competing software:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170822083048/http://www.putty....

The domain owner seems to feel he was providing a service to putty by providing the short domain name and feels slighted that they are moving to have their own now that he is taking actions that they find more objectionable than just also linking to his competitor, but to be honest it always seemed some unethical squatting to me, based on the Putty devs not having the time to complete a UDRP process.

Post reply on HN