Live data from Hacker News

Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

github.com

241–250 of 424 posts

Re: Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

#241

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should be added that the malicious part is often done by a third party that takes over an open source project when the original developer doesn't have the time/energy/money to maintain their open source/free work. Many Chrome extensions end up being sold for thousands or just hundreds of dollars because there's no money in them and the dev isn't all that interested. Society as a whole could easily avoid this by fundi…

Every time piracy or Youtube ads come up, HNers grandstand on how they don't even pay a dime to the content creators making the hundreds of hours of videos they watch. GGs if you want a buck for the VSCode theme you made.

I proudly block ads while giving directly to the people that make the stuff I like.

I know I'm in the minority, but I block ads because of memetic hygiene. I don't want to deprive artists but I'm not sitting through adslop for a podcaster's sake.

Re: Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

#242
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>as there's nothing in either BSD or MIT that allows for re-licensing But also nothing preventing you from doing it. MIT can be relicensed, for sure.

No, it cannot. You can incorporate an MIT licensed work into a work that is licensed differently, but compatibly (not a real problem with MIT), but now you have three works that are under different licenses: the MIT part, the "other" part and the whole. The MIT part stays MIT. Someone can cherry-pick just that file (or file snippet) and use it under MIT, without caring about the license of the whole.

What happens when a file was previously under MIT, the license changes, and a new change is made? Do I need to look at the git blame to find which parts I can use as MIT?

Re: Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

#245

Looks like he's responded to it here. Delusional maniac? (Also, don't download and install that file he links) https://github.com/material-theme/vsc-material-theme/discuss...

Is there any archive to that discussion? It's now deleted and couldn't find it on archive.is

Re: Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

#246
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We do not plan to add a permission model in the next 6 months. I guess Copilot functionality trumps "Security above all else" now. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/05/03/prioritizing-sec...

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Material Theme has been pulled from VS Code's marketplace

#247
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As the original Copyright holder, you can do that. It just doesn't make the old Apache licensed version disappear.

I thought the MIT license was the original one?

It was Apache2, see this (preserved) fork.

https://github.com/Dramaga11/vsc-material-theme/blob/main/LI...

Post reply on HN