Live data from Hacker News

X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

disruptionist.com

241–250 of 834 posts

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#242
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do they believe free in free speech, or will I also be banned/blocked from saying things there?

>>Do they believe free in free speech No they don't, blue-sky belongs to the former twitter owner, aka THE BUBBLE ;) BTW: He was not welcomed at FOSDEM because he is billionaire, when a movement eats itself ;) https://drewdevault.com/2025/01/16/2025-01-16-No-Billionares...

He was not welcomed by a small minority at FOSDEM*

Minorities with loud voices always wins because people don't want to deal with bullshit

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#243
post #233
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> allowing hate, racist, homophobic, and transphobic language to run rampant Are the people with these views not also entitled to free speech and equal rights to express themselves the same as everybody else?

Free speech doesn't allow you to say anything at all you know? Calling for the eradication of people with certain sexual preferences or skin color for example.

Free speech doesnt have asterisks. If certain people say things that are undesireable to other certain people, they have to power to ignore them.

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#244
post #233
post #196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> allowing hate, racist, homophobic, and transphobic language to run rampant Are the people with these views not also entitled to free speech and equal rights to express themselves the same as everybody else?

Free speech doesn't allow you to say anything at all you know? Calling for the eradication of people with certain sexual preferences or skin color for example.

[deleted]

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#246

Ironically, three years ago, Musk encouraged the use of Signal and tweeted: " Use Signal ", https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1347165127036977153 Edit: In my opinion, Elon Musk initially endorsed Signal because of its strong encryption, security, and commitment to privacy. Now, he's blocking it for those very same reasons—what a blatant double standard! On a related note, one of the key advantages of the modern internet—…

Don't the DOGE dweebs use Signal?

Though I think they were forced to stop.

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#247
post #207

The logical explanation to me is that most of the Signal contacts shared tend to be for drugs or CSAM trading, so they went for the nuclear approach to make moderation easier.

Is that true? I’ve never used signal.

Telegram is overwhelmingly the app of choice for drug dealers with Whatsapp coming second, at least on a direct to customer level.

No clue about CSAM but I'd really doubt it considering it requires a phone number.

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#248
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> Remember how he exposed government meddling with twitter and everyone called it nothing burger. Please provide actual evidence of said government meddling with Twitter.

I can't speak to the evidence or lack thereof, but this is what they were referring to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Files

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#249
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> anti-Semites have a pretty loud and public voice in the "Western" world So do Jews. So are we seeing full free speech in action? Or is whats right decided by which side people agree with?

>So are we seeing full free speech in action? Even free speech has its limits...for example calling for the extermination of a race. >Or is whats right decided by which side people agree with? Correct, most of the time it is, and that is exactly why laws (esp. international ones) exist and Justitia is/should be blind.

[flagged]

Re: X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

#250

Remember the Arab Spring and how Twitter was hailed as a tool for the masses to fight against their oppressors? And remember how Elon bought Twitter, loudly proclaiming he was doing so to defend free speech? I'm mildly curious to see how X tries to justify this, but I suspect they've reached the stage where they don't even need to pretend to pay lip service to their notional values.

There is so much censorship going on on Twitter through the use of dark patterns, that it's embarrassing to claim it to be something like a fortress of free speech.

Let alone the fact that you need to have a subscription in order to obtain a "somewhat fair" exposure. It's ridiculous.

Post reply on HN