Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As in, the thing that tried to implement Linux syscall interfaces on top of the Windows kernel? It's really funny, NT was supposed to be great at three things: - be easily ported to different hardware architectures, which then never actually became relevant (and nowadays macOS is the best example for actual architecture migrations!) - have a much more sophisticated and elaborate security model than those filthy uni…
> - be easily ported to different hardware architectures, which then never actually became relevant Commercially relevant, perhaps, but it has remained technically relevant: The NT Kernel has historically operated on lots of different hardware architectures and continues to run on a small variety today. The ARM port is still active and a living branch even if total hardware sales are fewer than projected and Microsof…
Microsoft itself made a mess out of the developer experience.
Now I am back to distributed computing, and for anything Windows the classical frameworks are good enough.