Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s kind of what I had in mind, I don’t really know if it’s feasible or not but if I had billions of dollars deposited in my Robinhood account just made the order for that many shares, would it not go through?
Typically this is what you see on a stock: > Bid [500 x $64.39], [$64.42 x 100] Ask It means that someone currently offers to buy 500 shares at the price of $64.39. It means that someone currently offers to sell 100 shares at the price of $64.42. In practice, it means that you can buy 100 shares at the price of $64.42, then, after, it will move to the next price level. => You can see the "depth" of offers, it's calle…
Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
241–250 of 510 posts
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#242All these intellectual property lawsuits look like an economic loss overall. The laws don’t work as intended if they aimed to encourage innovation
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#243Why doesn't Apple just buy this company instead of fighting with them?
It was probably much cheaper to just gut their consumer engineering team instead. The whole company is focused a lot on medical devices Apple wants no part of, they just want the consumer part. Though it feels like an oversight to me. In this field, like in telecom modems, patents mean a lot, so I also wonder why didn't Apple seek to buy out the consumer part of Masimo along with their patent portfolio. Maybe they di…
- loss of sales of watches
- either battling in court for who knows how long or settling out of court for god knows how much money.
The real move would have been to just.. Grow a team internally. I mean come on, ox sensors? They couldn't have figured that out without poaching a well established med-tech company?
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#244All these intellectual property lawsuits look like an economic loss overall. The laws don’t work as intended if they aimed to encourage innovation
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#245 a plurality of emitters configured to emit light, each of the emitters comprising at least two light emitting diodes (LEDs);
four photodiodes arranged within the user-worn device and configured to receive light after at least a portion of the light has been attenuated by tissue of the user;
a protrusion comprising a convex surface including separate openings extending through the protrusion and lined with opaque material, each opening positioned over a different one associated with each of the four photodiodes, the opaque material configured to reduce an amount of light reaching the photodiodes without being attenuated by the tissue;
optically transparent material within each of the openings; and
one or more processors configured to receive one or more signals from at least one of the four photodiodes and output measurements responsive to the one or more signals, the measurements indicative of the oxygen saturation of the user.
How was this granted a patent? With some fudging, we can stretch this to describe every single pulseoximeter made in the past 50 years.I would like to assume good faith on behalf of the plaintiffs, but this seems like patent trolling by an otherwise legitimate company.
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
surely the lost revenue would exceed the licensing cost? Assuming a spherical cow, and that Apple's decision-makers aren't completely incapable of basic math, the logical conclusion would be...? (Spoiler: I assume the patent-holder is asking some outrageous sum. Or there's a piece of the story we're missing. Or maybe some kind of game of chicken.)
If you can't agree on licensing terms, then you sell the watch without the infringing technology. Nobody (relatively speaking) is making a buy/not buy decision on the Apple Watch due to its blood oxygen monitor functionality. It's a feature that isn't important or necessary for the vast majority of people.
Do you have data on this? I think it's a pretty big deal.
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#247a plurality of emitters configured to emit light, each of the emitters comprising at least two light emitting diodes (LEDs); four photodiodes arranged within the user-worn device and configured to receive light after at least a portion of the light has been attenuated by tissue of the user; a protrusion comprising a convex surface including separate openings extending through the protrusion and lined with opaque mate…
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
> some parts of them seem to definitely be a prior art The standard is to consider ALL of the elements together in the specific configuration. If this were not the case, then any invention that incorporated any conventional element (e.g., a lever) would be invalid.
It cannot be that simple, can it? Otherwise changing a single element (say "concave surface" to "sine-shaped surface", or "strap" to "clamp") would invalidate the patent.
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's pretty nontrivial to buy a majority interest in any public company. It's not like you can just spend 1/2 the current market cap to acquire it, the price will shoot up drastically as soon as the market is aware of someone (especially Apple) trying to do it.
> the price will shoot up drastically as soon as the market is aware of someone Will that still happen if you put in a single order to buy 51% of all the shares at a price a little above the current market value ? That trade will be complete before the market "sees" you are trying to buy a ton.
For small-time consumers who are buying a few shares here and there - it will appear like there is always some available, but when you are talking about a majority share of the company there isn't that availability sitting there waiting to be just taken.
Re: Apple to halt Apple Watch Series 9 and Ultra 2 sales in the US this week
#250a plurality of emitters configured to emit light, each of the emitters comprising at least two light emitting diodes (LEDs); four photodiodes arranged within the user-worn device and configured to receive light after at least a portion of the light has been attenuated by tissue of the user; a protrusion comprising a convex surface including separate openings extending through the protrusion and lined with opaque mate…
the same way that Apple's "rounded corners for smartphones" was a patent.