Live data from Hacker News

Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

politico.com

241–250 of 273 posts

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#241
Simply threatening to ban or impose other punishments on a platform can be enough to make it comply with demands of the state: That's a nice social media platform you got there. It would be a shame if anything happened to it.

As evidence that Tiktok has caved to censorship demands, Mondoweis.com was banned today from Tiktok with no reason given.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#242
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

First, the trade war already started with China banning US companies domestically. Second, it’s not like the US can’t trade more with its South American neighbors instead anyways.

> China banning US companies domestically. When did this happen?

~2009 was FB, google, clouds followed in 2017 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-amazon-cloud/amazon...

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#243
post #163
post #157

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure how the behavior of the MPAA or RIAA has any relevance on how the DoJ functions.

Just an example of an entity using laws to punish everyday people we thought might otherwise go unpunished.

The RIAA generally only threatened to sue people who were infringing thousands of songs, and generally offered to settle for around $2-3 per song.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#244
post #23

I haven't heard a good explanation yet for whether this is even legal. It seems like a textbook example of an unconstitutional bill of attainder. You'd have to ban TikTok based on something it does , and any such law would impact a lot of other companies too. Or I guess you could ban all Chinese software using trade laws, but that has even bigger ramifications.

To be a bill of attainder it would have to criminalize things that have already happened and were not criminal when they happened.

A bill that says it is criminal to have ever had TikTok on your phone or it is criminal to have every distributed TikTok in the US would likely be a bill of attainder.

A bill that says that after some date that future it becomes illegal to have TikTok or distribute it would not be a bill of attainder.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#245
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Surely this would mostly apply to non-chinese companies, no? This would wipe the market out.

OK. How about “they’re using the app to spy on us for a Foreign Hostile Government ”

So long as this is equally applied to a domestic hostile government I'm fine with that.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Propaganda is widely used on social media (GP) > how it can be used to manipulate narratives On the domestic side of things, Elon Musk is doing this, to an extreme degree, with X/Twitter. I'm someone that follows mostly left-wing/liberal/progressive accounts, yet I keep seeing tweets on my feed (even in the "For you" timeline) from right-wing accounts (that I don't follow). It's extremely annoying, and it is plain…

that footnote is a whirlwind. either make the minor sacrifices necessary to live your values, or tone down the rhetoric to be in line with your actual, demonstrated values.

I mean yea, I've been personally considering switching away from Teslas to some other manufacturer's BEV or PHEV. But the sub-$70k options for high quality cars are quite limited. (I know a lot of people will dispute that the Tesla Model 3 or Model Y are high quality, but personally I really like the design, aesthetics, driving feel, the mobile app experience, and other aspects of Tesla.) To be clear, all/most of the credit for this excellence goes to the talented engineers (and designers) in California, and absolutely not to Musk. I do keep on skimming lists of new/upcoming PHEVs and BEVs (and digging into their specs and watching reviews of them) in the hope that I'll find something that'll be a true upgrade from my Tesla. But I haven't found anything quite yet though.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#247
post #188
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. There's a huge difference between a private entity launching civil lawsuits and the DoJ launching criminal lawsuits 2. I don't know what specific case you're referring to by "MPAA and RIAA [...] go after little old grandmas for their love savings", but the relevant laws likely predated mp3s and filesharing programs, so it's not clear how "we thought might otherwise go unpunished" would apply here. If anything it's…

I think you are looking too deeply into this. 1. When the comparison I'm trying to draw is "huge powerful entity using its power", what exactly is the difference? 2. I don't think there needs to be a specific case - it was in the news often enough for it to be a common thing. Here is an EFF article reviewing what happened years later: https://www.eff.org/wp/riaa-v-people-five-years-later "Five years later, the record…

You're comparing apples to floor tiles as though the comparison is relevant in the least. I think that's the issue you and the others are having in these discussions.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#248
post #242
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> China banning US companies domestically. When did this happen?

~2009 was FB, google, clouds followed in 2017 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-amazon-cloud/amazon...

What ban? FB, Google, etc simply chose not to follow chinese laws and left. What US laws is tiktok violating? None.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#249
post #93
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You still didn't explain the risks too clearly. Let's grant that TikTok is under direct CCP control, and specifically targets kids. Targets them for what? Mind control?

> Targets them for what? Mind control? Attempts to change/form their views to be favourable towards dictatorships and antagonistic to democracies.

> Attempts to change/form their views to be favourable towards dictatorships and antagonistic to democracies.

Rather than china, I'm more concerned about foreigners like you interfering in america and american social media.

What's your particular interest in this? You aren't even american.

Re: Lawmakers shift gears on TikTok ban

#250
post #242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

~2009 was FB, google, clouds followed in 2017 https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-amazon-cloud/amazon...

What ban? FB, Google, etc simply chose not to follow chinese laws and left. What US laws is tiktok violating? None.

Please practice the lost art of reading the article. Hint: it's discussing possible legislation.
Post reply on HN