I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
It looks like it just got taken offline
North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
241–250 of 302 posts
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#242I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars, and no banner to indicate that the tool is malicious. There is a recently filed issue with a link to the Google blog post, but that's it. If anyone from Github is reading this -- I strongly suggest adding a banner or modal dialogue to warn users about the backdoor in this tool, and any other software with a known backdoor (e.g. forks of the project)
> I notice that the getsymbol tool on Github has 214 stars ... Analysis of which accounts starred it prior to publicity is probably a worthwhile endeavor. If there's any commonality with other obscure projects, that may be an indicator those accounts could be puppets.
I hope an analysis like you proposed could yield some insights to patterns or maybe even enough data to do some machine learning on.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#243This is doubly concerning: Not only for researchers, but also for the public. I always imagined the North Koreans to be at a technical level where they would be the ones consuming published exploits more so than imagining their own. This article means that they are advanced enough to focus on suppressing knowledge rather than consuming what is publicly available.
There is an interesting podcast called Lazarus Heist that covers this stuff.
Gave a lot of insight and background into North Korean hackers, how they operate, how they live and so on. I was familiar with their operations from before, like the SWIFT hack from being in the infosec field. But I still learned a lot.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#244> Upon discovery, all identified websites and domains are added to Safe Browsing to protect users from further exploitation. dbgsymbol.com is NOT showing up with warning in Safe Browsing on my Brave browser. (warning, unknown vector)
Safe browsing is there for Google to spy on you easily, not to detect hacks.
1 - The first 4 bytes of all url hashes in the blocklist are cached in the browser.
2 - When there is a match, you request of Google the actual urls on the blocklist.
3 - Client side your browser blocks loading the url.
Google only knows that the site had a hash collision with the first 4 bytes of something in the blocklist.
I, personally, think that's a fair price for otherwise free malware protection. It's also built into Firefox and on by default. [2]
[1] https://developers.google.com/safe-browsing/v4#update-api-v4
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah — other than the famines, forced labor, summary executions, and mandatory dictator cult it’s probably a great place.
If you're a member of an elite cyber-intelligence military branch who knows, it might not be as bad. The USA is also great if you earn 200k/y as a software developer. If you're a teacher, not so much.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#246What I wonder is this: these North Koreans clearly have unrestricted internet access (sort of have to to find 0-days) and they also clearly at least understand English. How have they not accidentally stumbled across media that shows them all the things their state media doesn't?
North Americans and Western Europeans are incredibly naive about how authoritarian states work. All authoritarian states will end up having a caste sysem hierarchy. The upper caste have it just as good a people in the West and in modern times they will have unfiltered access to the Internet. They have zero reason to revolt because they have everything then need.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wouldn't help if the source code already has the backdoor in there though. Most people would just download and build a tool off GitHub if it has 200 stars and does what they need.
>> By building their binaries from source and hosting them on their servers > Wouldn't help if the source code already has the backdoor in there though I'm not sure if you're aware but random tools don't just spawn in official package repositories overnight. There's a vetting process, for both new packages and new maintainers. Also in established distros, packages don't get accepted to official repositories unless it…
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
And the GitHub Actions… oh man… Insert some tool in your build that comes from another random repository, that uploads an artifact to S3 or similar… GitHub’s architecture entirely is the iMessage of source code.
Could you please expand on your iMessage comparison? I don't understand what you're referencing.
It would be very easy to add a backdoor to one of those build steps.
The comparison with iMessage is that it’s unsafe by design, at the architecture level, because you’re relying on live code made by anonymous people. One day, attack vectors will be found every second day.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
They are almost certainly pulling on talent pools from one of the neighboring nations.
You can say China, they cannot kill you over the internet... yet.
Re: North Korean campaign targeting security researchers
#250I’m surprised that NK can have such weak computing education at the population level and still find enough high level hackers and cybersecurity people to do these things.