Bun 0.6 • Hacker News Board

Re: Bun 0.6

#241

Post by ignoramous » Sat, May 20, 2023, 8:33 AM UTC

doodlesdev wrote: post #169

ignoramous wrote: post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From experience, static websites on https://pages.dev are blazing fast (and free); ex: pagespeed result for a static webpage I host: https://archive.is/PkZbO Netifly was equally fast (not free).

Cloudflare is indeed absurdly fast. I haven't been impressed with Netlify's speed, although I am using the free plan (don't think it makes sense to upgrade if I'm already not super happy with performance). When you say paid Netlify is as fast as Cloudflare do you mean the Pro plan or the Enterprise plan? AFAIK the enterprise plans run on a different network, with more distributed servers, although I could be wrong. I…

> When you say paid Netlify is as fast as Cloudflare do you mean the Pro plan or the Enterprise plan?

I was on their £19/mo plan, not Enterprise. And those websites were as fast as the ones on pages.dev.

Re: Bun 0.6

#242

Post by opengears » Sun, May 21, 2023, 2:22 PM UTC

postalrat wrote: post #236

Jarred wrote: post #137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

wow thats rough i'm sorry can you file an issue with some code that reproduces it? will take a look

I did upgrade to bun 0.6.1. Haven't seen the segvault on startup yet but still seeing the memory leak. Maybe even slightly faster than before. Will check my code to see if it could be causing the issue.

Can you point us to the code so we can figure out where the memory leak originates from?

Re: Bun 0.6

#243

Post by gavmor » Tue, May 23, 2023, 12:31 AM UTC

Kamq wrote: post #239

gavmor wrote: post #224

Earlier quoted context omitted.

JSON is great, for sure, and "calling random APIs" gets even better with type definition autocompletion!

If you make me start statically typing the random scripts I write to munge data round to answer business questions, I quit.

Fair enough.