Live data from Hacker News

Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4

arxiv.org

241–244 of 244 posts

Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4

#241
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

so strange. I heard that saying for the first time yesterday on a youtube video comment section. Weird I've seen in it twice in less than 24 hours

The phenomenon you are referring to is called the "Baader-Meinhof phenomenon," also known as the "frequency illusion" or "recency illusion." It occurs when you learn something new, such as a word, a concept, or an idea, and suddenly start noticing it everywhere. This effect is believed to be the result of a combination of selective attention and confirmation bias, which make you more likely to notice and remember thi…

yeah yeah. sometimes you do just hear things in clumps tho. Specifically, I heard that from a youtube video that was probably recommended to millions of people on the same day. So yeah, probably not a frequency illusion

Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4

#242
post #238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So basically you're saying it's just an algorithm running on a computer? Yes I agree with that.

It is an algorithm running a computer. The software is whatever you prompt engineered. That is the algorithm running on the computer. You know, I think that some people (I see on twitter, probably not you) have a wrong intuition about artificial intelligence. They see models which are fundamentally stochastic as incapable of really ever being truly intelligent. It's "just statistics" or just a "stochastic parrot" and…

I agree with that.

The Transformer architecture does not satisfy the Markov property by formal definition. ChatGPT is not a Markov chain.

However the Turing machine which is executing the algorithm does satisfy the Markov property. So you're talking about a lower level of abstraction where any computation of any algorithm is just "running on a Markov chain".

Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4

#243
post #236
post #217

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think that's clear at all. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10559 shows a LLM is doing gradient descent on the context window at inference time. If it's learning relationships between concepts at runtime based on information in the context window then it seems about as useful to say it is a Markov chain as it is to say that a human is a Markov chain. Perhaps we are, but the "current state" is unmeasurably complex.

Well all the information it learns at runtime is encoded in the context window. I don't feel like {tokens}^ctxWindow is unmeasurably complex. I think one should see a transformer as a stochastic computer operating on its memory. If you modelled a computer as a stochastic process, would you taje the state space to consist of the most recent instruction, or instead the whole memory of the computer?

GPT-4 has a token window of 32K tokens. I don't think GPT-4's vocabulary size has been released but GPT-3 is 175K. I guess yes, the complexity is technically measurable but it does seem pretty large!
Post reply on HN