Earlier quoted context omitted.
so strange. I heard that saying for the first time yesterday on a youtube video comment section. Weird I've seen in it twice in less than 24 hours
The phenomenon you are referring to is called the "Baader-Meinhof phenomenon," also known as the "frequency illusion" or "recency illusion." It occurs when you learn something new, such as a word, a concept, or an idea, and suddenly start noticing it everywhere. This effect is believed to be the result of a combination of selective attention and confirmation bias, which make you more likely to notice and remember thi…
Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4
241–244 of 244 posts
Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
So basically you're saying it's just an algorithm running on a computer? Yes I agree with that.
It is an algorithm running a computer. The software is whatever you prompt engineered. That is the algorithm running on the computer. You know, I think that some people (I see on twitter, probably not you) have a wrong intuition about artificial intelligence. They see models which are fundamentally stochastic as incapable of really ever being truly intelligent. It's "just statistics" or just a "stochastic parrot" and…
The Transformer architecture does not satisfy the Markov property by formal definition. ChatGPT is not a Markov chain.
However the Turing machine which is executing the algorithm does satisfy the Markov property. So you're talking about a lower level of abstraction where any computation of any algorithm is just "running on a Markov chain".
Re: Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think that's clear at all. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10559 shows a LLM is doing gradient descent on the context window at inference time. If it's learning relationships between concepts at runtime based on information in the context window then it seems about as useful to say it is a Markov chain as it is to say that a human is a Markov chain. Perhaps we are, but the "current state" is unmeasurably complex.
Well all the information it learns at runtime is encoded in the context window. I don't feel like {tokens}^ctxWindow is unmeasurably complex. I think one should see a transformer as a stochastic computer operating on its memory. If you modelled a computer as a stochastic process, would you taje the state space to consist of the most recent instruction, or instead the whole memory of the computer?