Live data from Hacker News

Fake Books

lcamtuf.substack.com

241–250 of 371 posts

Re: Fake Books

#241

I think there’s a good chance it was ghost written by a content farm for someone who wanted to publish a book in a popular category to make a quick buck. I recently learned that this is a soft-scam technique advocated for by a couple of guys called the Mikkelson Twins. They say you can make money by publishing audiobooks on audible by finding a popular topic on audible, then hiring a ghost writing service to write yo…

[deleted]

Re: Fake Books

#242
post #223

One of the things that has kept me out of the cryptocurrency space is that when their advocates discuss value, they speak in pure nonsense. A big part of that problem is that value is very difficult to discuss. On the one hand you have the classic goldbug that insists that gold has "intrinsic value", which is some sort of platonic ideal thing that gold simply ambiently has and defies any attempt to nail down what it…

The value of something is simply what other people are willing to pay for it.

The marginal revolution is dead. Long live the marginal revolution!

Re: Fake Books

#243
post #218
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As the saying goes, there’s a sucker born every minute¹. An important feature of these scams is to frame success and failure as being entirely in your hands: it’s not the system’s fault that you didn’t achieve success, it’s yours and yours alone, you didn’t want it bad enough. Someone who falls in that hole is bound to do it again, this time for a different grift which looks easier. They’ll do as much as it takes unt…

Oh, no, I do get why people would buy into money-making courses. I'm basically wondering why the market for money-making courses isn't a winner-take-all market, with the wealthiest course-creators spending their advertising budgets (that they earned by building their money-making-course empire when the field was more green) to outcompete upstarts in the money-making course market. Presumably, people can only be activ…

> so why aren't most people focused on learning + putting into practice, the techniques of a few very popular courses?

Because that entails hard work.

Re: Fake Books

#244
post #223

One of the things that has kept me out of the cryptocurrency space is that when their advocates discuss value, they speak in pure nonsense. A big part of that problem is that value is very difficult to discuss. On the one hand you have the classic goldbug that insists that gold has "intrinsic value", which is some sort of platonic ideal thing that gold simply ambiently has and defies any attempt to nail down what it…

The value of something is simply what other people are willing to pay for it.

The issue is the aggregation of such a volatile concept such that entire markets can be based on such pricing model.

That way lies the enablement of massive fraud.

Re: Fake Books

#245
post #118
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Except what the Mikkelson Twins actually make money on is selling you on a “money making course” where they tell you to do the above. So there’s all kinds of people trying to follow this method out there, it seems. How do people still become wealthy selling "money making courses", when enough people have created "money making courses" that they are, themselves, a commodity?

You sell a money making course course generator and sell that

There's a famous old ad where someone put an ad in the newspaper that said "Learn how to make money, send $10 to XXXX". Sending the $10 in got you a letter that said: "place an ad in the newspaper that says "Learn how to make money, sent $10 to [your address]."

Re: Fake Books

#246
post #223

One of the things that has kept me out of the cryptocurrency space is that when their advocates discuss value, they speak in pure nonsense. A big part of that problem is that value is very difficult to discuss. On the one hand you have the classic goldbug that insists that gold has "intrinsic value", which is some sort of platonic ideal thing that gold simply ambiently has and defies any attempt to nail down what it…

Some human desires are more predictable. You can ground out some value in basic human needs: food, clothing, shelter. They imply land value (for example, agricultural land) and energy usage (heat, transport, production) though not in a straightforward way. And various security measures can be valuable because any of the above could be taken away.

This doesn't imply stable prices, though. Far from it!

Re: Fake Books

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think it's that scary. I mean it's basically spam isn't it? The only thing new is the volume in which you can produce surface-level-indistinguishable spam. It is now cheaper to produce lots of flowery, meaningless text that is full of definitions. I suspect that the future of literature is more concise and externally-meaningful writing. Amazon is a terrible marketplace insofar as the rating system isn't sybil…

I have not yet hacked a good way to search around it though. It presents a massive time sink for me (not to mention frustration) and is probably multiplied across the population. More and more, when I search for advice, review, explanation, solution, or description, I virtually exclusively get articles/websites/books/sources that at first glance (certainly as far as Google and Bing can tell) are exactly what I am loo…

For this reason, I have tended to rely more and more on recommendations from obviously real people these days, e.g., as found in comments on Reddit, or in the New York Times's Wirecutter. The challenge with this approach is that Reddit seems to be gamed more and more by industry and other PR "bots", which makes it hard to sift wheat from chaff. But if the subreddit is not on a controversial topic, it's still possible to find disinterested recommendations, or so it seems.

Re: Fake Books

#248
post #72

Earlier quoted context omitted.

10,000? Could it be 100,000? I have to write 10,000 words overnight occasionally in my role. If it’s $2500 for 10k words, maybe I should be ghostwriting…

10,000 words on a random subject that you probably never heard about before?

College students regularly do this, it's called "not showing up to lecture and writing the final paper anyways" :P

Re: Fake Books

#249

Contrary to what the article says it IS possible to find information about NFP chemotherapy on the internet. E.g.: Of these patients, 44 were treated with HAIC and 20 with sorafenib. HAIC involved cisplatin (50 mg fine powder in 5-10 ml lipiodol) and a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (FU) (1,500 mg/5 days), which is referred to as new 5-FU and cisplatin therapy (NFP). [1] [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/292…

Correct. However, the "NFP" in that paper refers to a specific drug regimen, and bears no resemblance to the nonsensical dosing methodology described in the book. (I mean, come on, "Eastern methods of measurement"??)

Re: Fake Books

#250
post #223

One of the things that has kept me out of the cryptocurrency space is that when their advocates discuss value, they speak in pure nonsense. A big part of that problem is that value is very difficult to discuss. On the one hand you have the classic goldbug that insists that gold has "intrinsic value", which is some sort of platonic ideal thing that gold simply ambiently has and defies any attempt to nail down what it…

While I fully agree with your point, the next time I see some collective delusion of a pyramid scheme I’ll buy in early.

It doesn’t matter that there’s no logic to it, as long as enough people share the same delusion it becomes self-propagating.

Post reply on HN