I realize "Plasma" is the name of the KDE presentation layer across all platforms, but it's mildly awkward to see in this context considering plasma TVs have only been a dead technology for six years or so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_display
Frankly it's disappointing that most of the comments on HN so far have been focused on the "marketing" and the website. The FAQ states that this project is still in very early stages and not yet intended for use as a daily driver. So if you actually read the website, it's clear why it's not consumer grade. I would much rather they focus on developing than marketing at this stage. The basic thing going on here is simp…
Plasma Bigscreen
241–250 of 276 posts
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
The biggest hurdle is the DRM. Plasma Bigscreen ship with it's own browser but you still need the proprietary blob for the DRM running on an ARM device instead of the usual one for intel/amd. Making things worse, even on intel/amd the video quality is often limited to 1080p on Linux.
Funny, since DRM is never an issue if you play pirated content. Arrgh maties! But ironically, DRM is only a huge annoyance for paying law abiding customers. Did you pay Ubisoft $50 10 years ago for Assassin's Creed 2, am amazing game? Great, because now you can go f*ck yourself instead of playing the game since Ubisoft took the server running the DRM for that game offline. Did you pirate the game? Great, because now…
https://copyright.gov/1201/2015/fedreg-publicinspectionFR.pd...
Yes, it still sucks when publishers make their customers jump through hoops like this, potentially exposing them to malware if the necessary DRM circumvention software comes from a dubious source.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#243I realize "Plasma" is the name of the KDE presentation layer across all platforms, but it's mildly awkward to see in this context considering plasma TVs have only been a dead technology for six years or so: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_display
Frankly it's disappointing that most of the comments on HN so far have been focused on the "marketing" and the website. The FAQ states that this project is still in very early stages and not yet intended for use as a daily driver. So if you actually read the website, it's clear why it's not consumer grade. I would much rather they focus on developing than marketing at this stage. The basic thing going on here is simp…
Maybe the post's main link should be changed to this one? That Bigscreen website seems to be confusing and out of date.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Is this some sort of alternative firmware to replace the junk installed as standard on most "smart" TVs now… I believe it's more along the lines of an open-source Apple TV or Roku box.
What could you actually run on something like that? None of “normal” apps would be there for the various streaming services. I guess it could be a plex front end but outside of that can it really do much people usually do with their TVs?
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
Frankly it's disappointing that most of the comments on HN so far have been focused on the "marketing" and the website. The FAQ states that this project is still in very early stages and not yet intended for use as a daily driver. So if you actually read the website, it's clear why it's not consumer grade. I would much rather they focus on developing than marketing at this stage. The basic thing going on here is simp…
Here's a link with a lot more information. The big news today is that the UI component for Bigscreen has just gone live as a part of the KDE 5.26 beta, which is relatively straightforward to install on any Linux distro (or image to a USB stick): https://kde.org/announcements/plasma/5/5.25.90/ Maybe the post's main link should be changed to this one? That Bigscreen website seems to be confusing and out of date.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
What makes the TV software better than OS software?
Usually software designed explicitly for the hardware where it runs, while OS software is designed to run on general hardware. If there is hardware specific fixes, they might be skipped as it'll make compatibility worse while software designed for exact hardware doesn't make tradeoffs like that at all.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#247My name ist fadlan adnrika
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#248Earlier quoted context omitted.
Perhaps you’ve noticed this already but having bought my last TV in 2008 I had no idea how cheap they’ve gotten! Checking Amazon right now I see a 50” 4k Samsung for $450.
Expense doesn’t always mean purely financial. There is an environmental cost to buying something new as well, and a social cost in supporting the manufacture of electronics that may have less than perfect supply chain ethical standards. I’m not saying this to be snarky or judgemental - your comment genuinely made me think about the issue and this was my response.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Windows is also pretty unpolished, I think it is impossible to get people to work on polishing unless you have infinity dollars, like Apple. At least Linux has the excuse that it is a community project -- things that the community decides not to work on are sort of definitionally not annoying enough to be worth working on, or they would.
Windows is polished, but their product people are terrible / constrained by someone higher up to do terrible stuff. Apple is getting there though, probably because of the same managerial culture.
Re: Plasma Bigscreen
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
Root file system (rootfs) that's based on dev-unstable branch of KDE Neon. This doc is obviously not aimed at non-techs, but for Linux-savy people the first sentence should fully explain the heading.
I think you mean KDE-savy - I've been using Linux for over 20 years and had no idea what this heading meant.