Live data from Hacker News

Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

experimentalhistory.substack.com

241–250 of 361 posts

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#241

This seems to be a major epidemic nowadays. I suspect that mechanistic, meaningless, purely mimetic pursuit of success has some pretty negative consequences on society. I suspect it might explain why so many people are interested in engaging in politics (or company politics) and zero-sum value extraction schemes instead of just adding value... They're not interested in the process at all, only in the outcome; financi…

Reminds me of that delayed gratification experiment with the kids and chocolates, except instead of eating the 2x reward the kid will then hold off for even more (for their whole life)!

Yes, this is one of those ideas that keeps me up at night. When I'm looking at this system in aggregate, I become aware that we're racing toward asceticism. Me and the person next to me are competing in what we can do without. Even more disconcerting is that as soon as we reach a new equilibrium of austerity someone will find a new way to jump ahead with another form of self-denial. Or in other words, those who live in excess are meant to be punished. It's completely absurd. I'm lucky I fall asleep before continuing too far down this path of thoughts

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#242
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it is a joke on the "there are only 5 story types" blather you hear, every so often.

Yes, there are only two story types. + Someone goes on a journey. + A stranger comes to town.

That's just one story from two perspectives though?

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#243
post #220

I made a summary of this article, because I found it a bit hard to read. I used GPT-3! Here's the summary: The author is saying that people who write about productivity are, in a way, the devil, because they convince people to do things they hate. The author is also saying that these people are not literally the devil, but are just as bad. The article argues that humans are not "naturally" lazy, and that the feeling…

Is there a firefox extension that can give me a GPT-3 summary of any given page? That would be super useful.

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#244

> For legal reasons, I’m not saying the people who write this stuff are literally Lucifer in human skin. It’s just that, if I wanted to maximize human misery, I would 100% try to convince people to spend more time doing things they hate When Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett wrote Good Omens thirty years ago they already hit upon this idea when Crowley, a demon and one of the main characters, tries to explain to his fe…

I also seem to remember that the story went on to say that Crowley at one point had been praised for his work in the Spanish Inquisition. That was the first he'd actually heard of it--humans had come up with it on their own--so he went and had a look, and then went and got blind drunk, because there are some things even demons would rather not think about. That kind of abrupt tonal slam, from comedy to horror, leavin…

To be fair, no one expects the Spanish Inquisition...

...I'll show myself out.

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#245
post #220

I made a summary of this article, because I found it a bit hard to read. I used GPT-3! Here's the summary: The author is saying that people who write about productivity are, in a way, the devil, because they convince people to do things they hate. The author is also saying that these people are not literally the devil, but are just as bad. The article argues that humans are not "naturally" lazy, and that the feeling…

If you don't have one hour to meditate, meditate for two hours.

If you find the article hard to read, consider listening to it. It will take longer but it will be easier. The author's reading of the article has a little extra humor too.

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I need to check, are you sarcastic? I have so far avoided Lewis due to an impression (way too old impression to remember where I got it, may be unfounded or not) of the texts being close to christian/religious zealotry?

I'm not trying to guess why you would say that (and by that, I mean the fact that you would avoid writing because it's trying to preach to you), and I do want to say that Lewis is, overall, very close to proselytizing in his writings (generally it's pretty explicitly stated that's what he wants to do). But. Avoiding something because it disagrees with your worldview, or because it is 'too close to [insert literally a…

> But also yes, it's an amazing piece of literature.

I think you are overselling. It's worth a read, but the writing is often stilted and repetitive, the central conceit interesting but tired by the end. It's not a long book, but probably would have been better as a shorter form.

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#247
post #220

I made a summary of this article, because I found it a bit hard to read. I used GPT-3! Here's the summary: The author is saying that people who write about productivity are, in a way, the devil, because they convince people to do things they hate. The author is also saying that these people are not literally the devil, but are just as bad. The article argues that humans are not "naturally" lazy, and that the feeling…

As someone who has not "used GPT-3" what does it mean to say that you used it to make a summary? Just dump the full text of the article into a tool and request a summary output? I have only seen GPT-3 used when it takes a prompt and then generates more related text, I didn't realize you could run that process in reverse.

> I have only seen GPT-3 used when it takes a prompt and then generates more related text

This is a fully general technique. Any repeatable problem can be rephrased as a prompt + related technique via the following structure:

  Problem: 

  Solution: 

  

  Problem: 

  Solution: 

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#248
post #220

I made a summary of this article, because I found it a bit hard to read. I used GPT-3! Here's the summary: The author is saying that people who write about productivity are, in a way, the devil, because they convince people to do things they hate. The author is also saying that these people are not literally the devil, but are just as bad. The article argues that humans are not "naturally" lazy, and that the feeling…

[deleted]

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> foie gras, salmi of duck, and the $5 esp32-wroom dev kits Never been a fan of chips in my sandwich, but each to their own I suppose.

But that satisfying crunch and galvanic shock of grounded fillings!

Full of minerals too!

Re: Excuse me but why are you eating so many frogs

#250

This is a great article but the best part is an off hand link to a book review of A Square Meal: A Culinary History of the Great Depression [1] which includes choice quotes like > The writer George Jean Nathan claimed that before the 1920s, there existed only eight basic sandwich types: Swiss cheese, ham, sardine, liverwurst, egg, corned beef, roast beef, and tongue (yes). But by 1926, he “claimed that he had counted…

Love tongue. Cook it occasionally and eat with horseradish mayonnaise
Post reply on HN