Live data from Hacker News

I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

codeamigo.dev

241–250 of 258 posts

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#241
post #198

Rejecting someone three times from something is pretty brutal. How bad could this candidate have been? Is Codeacademy like the Rhodes Scholarship or something? One of my luckiest breaks was when a college that rejected me the first time around accepted me the second time I applied. Really grateful for that opportunity.

How is it brutal? Dependeing on the job and the applicants CV/interviewing skills, it would be easy to consider that she/he is not a good fit for the company or the role. The fact that they have created their own site is not a reflection on Codecademy, just that the interview process is not necessarily great or even that they would still not be a good fit for CA for whatever reason. I don't like the tone of naming th…

> I don't like the tone of naming the company then basically sticking two fingers up at them "look at me now".

That’s true, me neither…

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#244

Good on you man! You: 1. Dodged a bullet (booo on any company that would reject someone with this level of passion). 2. Created your own product (which you seem even more passionate about) 3. Did all the heavy lifting to make it interesting out of the gate (provided content). Wishing you all the success!

> 1. Dodged a bullet (booo on any company that would reject someone with this level of passion). Passion is a double-edged sword: When a person's passions align closely with the company's needs, it's wonderful. But if a person's passions conflict with what the founders want, the passion can amplify the conflict. That's why it's important to understand exactly what the candidate is passionate about. If they're passion…

This is where you take a gamble and hire them, then ask them to leave if it really doesn't work. The chance you're giving up on a 10-100x leverage hire is just too high in such a case.

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Haven’t you answered your own question? Because they don’t want to build the widget you want them to build. They want to replace your whole engineering team. What about hiring them to replace the whole engineering team, saving on salaries? Then you’re fucked when that person gets bored and leaves. Hyper passionate individuals don’t make good hires. They might make good founders though.

The number of presumptions in your reply is astounding. Based on replies and the blog post, OP clearly has projected the best of intentions. This is classic owning of a clown show hiring process and the hiring wing of Codecademy by the OP. I say "well done."

You've misunderstood. I was directly answering the question in the comment that I was replying to. I know nothing about the OP's situation and said nothing about it.

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#246
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh, you don’t want to be rude? Really? Why just come in here to shit on the devs project? I saw your previous “constructive” criticism. Do you know how hard it is? How many fine details are involved in launching something? Please display some of your solo work, so we can see the merits of your valuable “feedback”

I definitely know how hard it is, I have 10 years of experience and I'm now staff eng and team lead at a 50B+ MC company. I had my own startup, and built many projects first-hand, but I'm not going to de-anonymize myself for the sake of argument. In my opinion, it should always be hard. OP had a good launch and delivered, which is something that's incredible and that only I also love the fact that he did this out of…

[deleted]

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#247
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is my experience also. As a freelance dev, I am hired as a foreign contractor. Being hired as a foreign contractor makes tax and regulations issues easier. If you are growing rapidly, You can open an LLC in America then operate as a US contractor. You can work with larger and established companies that way. It would be easier if you have a business partner in America. Hiring contractor has its pros and cons for…

I was always curious about this: Is there any reason why you need LLC in America to work with larger and established companies? Is there any law or limitation why they wouldn't like to work with e.g. European Self-Employed or LTD companies? Many of recruiters I talked to and they offered perm roles they won't consider changing to contractors. Always thought that generally contractors are a better deal for companies (…

Take my response with a grain of salt. I have been working as an offshore freelance dev but I am not registered as a local LLC or a US LLC. I might pick either US or Canadian LLC if I get paid really well for a permanent contract. But until then I hope to work with individuals, startups and small businesses.

One word answer (Pick One): Legitimacy/Accountability/Trust.

> Is there any reason why you need LLC in America to work with larger and established companies?

Companies need people they can hold accountable for the work they do. If you are an American LLC it means that you are a legitimate business that they can interact through proper legal channels and you are legally liable and held accountable under the contract. They are not going to take you to international court for breach of contract but if you are an American business you are fair game.

Also this allows you to sue client in failure of payment or breach of contracts. You have easy access to proper contract engagement services like escrow, small claims court etc.

With larger business you have higher degrees of authority as you come as a business based in America. It makes taxation and legal fillings easier for them. Money laundering acts, audit, tax fraud, wire fraud etc. have extremely strict laws and have serious consequences for a larger business. I have worked with people who are subjected to FinRa (wallstreet people). I had to file proper paperwork or there is a risk of them getting audited.

> Is there any law or limitation why they wouldn't like to work with e.g. European Self-Employed or LTD companies?

It is very grey. You have to file paperwork and send documentation that you are a legit tax paying business in your local country. You have audits and internal control team in large organization that cross checks every transaction made to individuals outside the company. You have to back it up with proper paperwork. Kind of a hassle for larger companies but if a startup, small business or an individual is hiring you that is no problem.

> Unless maybe when people here word 'contractor' they assume they will have to pay 2x more and that's why they prefer perm-employees? Or is there are any law in US that make it harder for companies to work this way?

There are some hassle but it mostly comes down how bad they want you. For individuals, startups and small business the pros far outweigh the cons. I am affordable, I am culturally on point, I am a decent dev. I submit invoice, I get paid. That's it.

But for larger companies there are some legal hassle. But if they really want you, they will find a way. They can hire you as an employee, or ask you send over paperwork as a business. The recruiter can and will make arrangements to hire you. But often times they could hire locally and not risk getting asked questions about you.

Very long answer but again grain of salt.

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#248
post #198

Rejecting someone three times from something is pretty brutal. How bad could this candidate have been? Is Codeacademy like the Rhodes Scholarship or something? One of my luckiest breaks was when a college that rejected me the first time around accepted me the second time I applied. Really grateful for that opportunity.

you should ask how bad the interviewing process in this industry is instead

Re: I was rejected by Codecademy three times, so I built my own

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For me, it was QBasic under MS-DOS. SCREEN 13 is the start of endless possibilities! I think this kind of experience is missing for kids now – but I'd guess it's more about how ubiquitous computers are, and how there's a lot more between the kid and the computer. When a CLI is your interface, making even rudimentary graphics feels like achieving magic. When your interface is a cell phone or GUI, there's a much larger…

Totally. I mean, as ridiculous as it may seem, the thing that got me into Linux was seeing a printout of a screenshot of Enlightenment 15 and just going “ what is that ” - and for me, the idea that a GUI could be visually exciting was revelatory - I ended up wrapping my head around SuSE 4.2 on hardware it hated, getting E16 running (hey, it took me a while to figure out X, never mind anything else), and ended up lear…

Heh, Enlightenment (somewhere before DR13) was also what got me interested in Linux, as a kid. But, in retrospect, I'd classify it as a "pretty UI" rather than a "great UI."
Post reply on HN