Live data from Hacker News

Husband of Amazon employee sentenced to prison for insider trading Amazon stock

justice.gov

241–243 of 243 posts

Re: Husband of Amazon employee sentenced to prison for insider trading Amazon stock

#241

Insider trade a million, you’ve got a problem. You have to insider trade a billion so that you’re untouchable. This is probably the hourly volume of insider trading at many hedge funds like SAC.

> You have to insider trade a billion so that you’re untouchable. Some source of that? I believe that is not true. Other shareholders don't really want managers to profit from insider trading.

Steve Cohen did not go to jail despite his firm pleasing guilty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cohen_(businessman)#SEC_...

Re: Husband of Amazon employee sentenced to prison for insider trading Amazon stock

#242

Stories like this boggle my mind. How do such people think that they are going to get away with this? If I were going to try something like this I would at least make some attempt to obfuscate my activities; trading through proxies, mixing in losing trades, something.

> How do such people think that they are going to get away with this? Many Americans think insider trading is l common than. If everyone is getting away with 70 mph, you can too. (Exhibit A: this thread.) In reality, insider trading enforcement is effective. The SEC looks for unusually profitable trades ex post facto . Their verification is easier than the insider trading. Wall Street doesn’t insider trade because it…

> Wall Street doesn’t insider trade because it’s stupid and there are lower-hanging fruit.

They do, its just that the CEO does not go to to jail

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cohen_(businessman)#SEC_...

Re: Husband of Amazon employee sentenced to prison for insider trading Amazon stock

#243

I love how no one on Wall Street was convicted of anything criminal even though they almost destroyed the entire global financial system. There was even text messages of fraud being committed and nothing happened. Not even clawbacks or fines or anything. The government just let them go. That was so disappointing, and one of the first signs of how Obama was going to betray the progressives and let Bush's status quo re…

I don't disagree with the general sentiment that the GFC was a total disaster, and I'd certainly not argue against the idea that a system had developed that had poor incentives, with sometimes greedy and unethical people working in it. What kind of concerns me, though, is the way that poor decision-making is conflated with breaking the law, or the belief that a terrible outcome ex-post necessarily implies illegality.…

> became so big and complex that it was beyond's anyone's ability to manage,

No that is now true, people wanted to regulate derivatives but Alan Greenspan and others who were in power decided not to.

Post reply on HN