Earlier quoted context omitted.
I recall Google Video being the better platform when it was first released. Had a clear interface, integrated with google search, and better performance. I have no idea how Google failed to gain the lead.
Some engineers wrote a couple of insightful internal post-mortems about Google Video after the YouTube acquisition. It's telling, I think, that the deep analysis of what went wrong came from front-line engineers rather than the executives you'd be expecting to produce it as part of their job. I read them many years ago so what follows might be a bit garbled by time and bad memory, but the gist of it went like this: 1…
YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
241–250 of 276 posts
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the ratio is 53 likes to 15,486 dislikes. Don't worry, Youtube has already proposed to hide dislikes numbers. That would be a good place to start. Edit: wow, 3 comments saying the exact same thing and all 3 starting with "don't worry". Interesting.
Maybe we’re all just rage hungry automatons.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#243Earlier quoted context omitted.
> An infertile woman is broken then? I don't know if I would necessarily use this particular word as it's mostly associated with lifeless objects, but in a sense - yes. Similarly to how having a disability or being an amputee is, for the lack of a better term, being "broken", as your body fails to function is some manner. Life is more nuanced and it's not all about that of course, but you get the idea. > Of course yo…
> Even still, there is always a chance that the computer will randomly malfunction and do something unexpected at any time. Unlikely, but possible. So you can never say for sure that an operation of 2 + 2 will result in 4. Your point? > If it's accurate enough then it's useful for making predictions. You know, science and stuff. If there is a counterexample to a scientific hypothesis, it's considered falsified. Not "…
I see what your issue is. I haven't noticed this previously, but I think you're just attacking a straw man at this point. Rarely you can say something with 100% certainty and science takes account for that. It's fine to make generalizations. If we didn't do that and only sought absolute truths, we wouldn't get too far and it'd invalidate entire fields of science.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#244Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm a fairly open minded person and I can change my mind if something makes sense to me. I assumed that maybe here I will find someone who can explain this thing to me, but so far I'm not impressed. The mean of perpetuating our species seems to be a too important detail to accept "it's none of your business" as an answer. I also think that if it's taught to children then it is a public matter.
Other people's bodies are not your means of anything . > I'm a fairly open minded person Open minded people don't need to say that.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
> For me, he's the greatest President because of the ACA. This is the very definition of uncritical, subjective thinking. :\
Precisely this! Not having any insurance in my late 20s, I voted for him thinking ACA was for the good of people. Then I got married, had 2 kids, business flourished, and purchased a house only to realize that ACA accounts for half of my mortgage. Currently paying $1k per month with all healthy members and without any pre-existing conditions!
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#246Susan: un-ban every political dissenter you've removed in the last 2 years and then we can talk.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
> For me, he's the greatest President because of the ACA. This is the very definition of uncritical, subjective thinking. :\
Precisely this! Not having any insurance in my late 20s, I voted for him thinking ACA was for the good of people. Then I got married, had 2 kids, business flourished, and purchased a house only to realize that ACA accounts for half of my mortgage. Currently paying $1k per month with all healthy members and without any pre-existing conditions!
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#248You should watch the video of her accepting the award. She talks about censoring people for violating the terms of service and the four responsibilities, one of which is to their advertisers. All this in an acceptance speech for freedom of speech. Talk about digging your own hole.
Someone can consider banning hateful speech as activity towards 'more' freedom of speech. I do not subscribe to this, but be aware that a lot of people are not willing to admit they are against freedom of speech, so they redefine the term.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some engineers wrote a couple of insightful internal post-mortems about Google Video after the YouTube acquisition. It's telling, I think, that the deep analysis of what went wrong came from front-line engineers rather than the executives you'd be expecting to produce it as part of their job. I read them many years ago so what follows might be a bit garbled by time and bad memory, but the gist of it went like this: 1…
Thumbs up, thumbs down, and comments. The very things that she would still like to see go away.
Re: YouTube CEO Susan Wojcicki Gets 'Freedom Expression' Award Sponsored by YouTube
#250I think people here are fundamentally misunderstanding what happened here. There is a nonprofit, the "Freedom Forum Institute" that awarded this award. Only the award ceremony was sponsored by YouTube. It's common practice for nonprofits to use awards like this as an opportunity to ask for donations, and for the company associated with that person to offer to sponsor the awards ceremony. I don't see anything to indic…
People share the optics of the event. The fact this institute got into this mess is kinda sad, but their impactfulness here is really 0. Despite all that it seems like shade scheme to nominate some rich ceo and beg for money to make some fakish award. But like I said nobody cares about them... there are worse scams to fight against.