Live data from Hacker News

The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

documentjournal.com

241–250 of 471 posts

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#241
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> While there may be no "algorithm" controlling the narrative you see on 4chan (or a straightforward and ostensibly fair one on a site like reddit), the content you see (and by extension, the narrative) is shaped by profit motive: From well-compensated marketing teams, to hordes of self-interested proselytizers (see: bitcoin), to propaganda teams looking to influence public opinion I've realized I have exactly one ou…

I find plenty of these types of communities through Discord, and I think that is part of the equation that's left out here. I don't really like discord much, but the reason I get when I do is to go check in on those friends. Usually these communities are just people that I've met playing games. I don't know that these would qualify as counter-culture or subculture, but they are free of marketing and advertising, and…

They do use discord like we used IRC, but discord is centralized under one company. So, they will eventually do what companies do and try to find that sweet spot of "how much abuse can our users take" versus "how much money can we extract from our market position" as with all such free services. Discord is a trap, both in the latent monetization sense mentioned, and the sense that all your communications there are gobbled up with little to no privacy guarantee.

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#242

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about exit from the platforms while continuing to build on the Internet? balajis.com vs twitter.com/balajis

I've been thinking exactly that. The problem is that the average internet user would have to: - buy a domain name (and pay for it every year) - rent hosting (cheapest provider is probably DO at 5$/month) - setup your machine so that it's secure enough it doesn't end up hacked - setup whatever is needed to publish content in your machine (could be as simple as HTML, but then the average internet user doesn't know HTML…

I don't think it's that hard or expensive to build and host a static site. You could even use github.io if you're desperate.

Hard for the average person? Probably, because most people aren't good with technology. But there are a lot of tools and support out there, for anyone motivated enough to learn.

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#243
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm hesitant to even admit that far-left politics are more accepted; I've seen harsher rejection of socialist ideals than legitimate, objective fascism. But I agree with your general point - if the far right was gone overnight, the far left would be next up on the chopping block. > highly uniform slightly left leaning milquetoast walled city. This is absolutely true, though. It's become their immediate point of mocke…

> I'm hesitant to even admit that far-left politics are more accepted Yea, I should have been more specific, it depends heavily on the circles you run in. > It's frustrating, because I think that the left should chill out with the identity politics It seems to me like this is not uncommon. There's a lot of oneupmanship in politics where whoever is the most rigid and unyielding to complexity in their belief system is…

> the reality distortion field would just target the next-lowest hanging fruit.

social media in a nutshell, unfortunately.

> people can't distinguish a rigid ideology from an internally consistent one.

I think this is one of the things people like about Bernie, tbh. I think his consistent and reliable world view (and voting record to match) is why he's been so successful. It's just sad that he's not the standard.

It feels like even when we "win" (air quotes are doing a lot of work ehre) e.g. Joe Biden or something, the goal posts get pushed and somehow all of a sudden it was catching an L when Biden won?

The recurring theme in American politics, to me, is that the right falls in line and votes, the left eats their own. I keep seeing it right now and I'm worried we won't hold it together in 2022 or 2024.

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#244

Still reading the article, but this is an interesting blurb if nothing else: "To be truly countercultural today, in a time of tech hegemony, one has to, above all, betray the platform, which may come in the form of betraying or divesting from your public online self." I hadn't thought of boycotting much of popular online space as being counter-cultural. It's an interesting thought.

> I hadn't thought of boycotting much of popular online space as being counter-cultural. It's an interesting thought.

The only winning move is not to play: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpmGXeAtWUw

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#245

Earlier quoted context omitted.

YouTube is filled with so many interesting little channels. I wish the algorithms highlighted them more. I remember one channel of an old guy just smoking a cigar for an hour. Said nothing, just sat there. There were thousands of videos of him doing this, going back years. I don’t remember the name of it, unfortunately.

Can you share a few? YouTube always seems to stick me in a bubble and never recommends any worthwhile new channels.

OrdinarySausage?

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#246
post #68

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Eschewing social media is not a culture in and of itself, anymore than eschewing the telephone or TV is a culture. But it is an attribute that some cultures have. Cultures have to be based around the actual ways they do interact, whether in person meetings via church groups, in person hiking groups, bike riding, falconry, camping, whatever. Similarly many people prefer to use person-to-person communication such as te…

It seems somewhat counter-cultural to not have social media and tv, though rejecting those things doesn't define a culture. I've had visitors to my house that realize I don't have a TV and they assume I'm some kind of judgemental weirdo.

I didn't have a TV for a long time out of spite towards the TV licencing system in the UK and the heavy-handed way it's enforced. I'd love someone with a background in RF engineering to explain how those TV detector vans are supposed to work with modern TVs and the massively higher electromagnetic noise floor!

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#247

Still reading the article, but this is an interesting blurb if nothing else: "To be truly countercultural today, in a time of tech hegemony, one has to, above all, betray the platform, which may come in the form of betraying or divesting from your public online self." I hadn't thought of boycotting much of popular online space as being counter-cultural. It's an interesting thought.

> I hadn't thought of boycotting much of popular online space as being counter-cultural. It's an interesting thought I think the interesting part is that it's kind of counter-culture but it itself is not really a culture at all. There are no groups (as far as I know) for people who eschew social media. They don't meet up at the pub and talk about it, they don't have any kind of organization, even a loose one. People…

It doesn’t need to be a culture, or atomized in that way. It isn’t a statement of identity, either.

It is being intentional about one’s time, attention, and emotions. Me, I play a lot more guitar these days, and really enjoy having something that I can learn.

Social media just doesn’t work for me. I can’t deal with a constant stream of people dumping their emotions. I’m aware that most other people can. And that’s fine. But I’m happier just ignoring it and working hard on work, family life, and guitar.

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#248

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems somewhat counter-cultural to not have social media and tv, though rejecting those things doesn't define a culture. I've had visitors to my house that realize I don't have a TV and they assume I'm some kind of judgemental weirdo.

I don't own a TV and most people here don't seem to know how to react to this information. Often they don't seem to have considered the possibility that someone wouldn't own one. I haven't watched television for entertainment in a decade or so, so I only get references which I absorb through YouTube, Twitch. I wouldn't think of myself countercultural, but it shows just how conforming many people are without realizing…

[deleted]

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

DDoSecrets targeted the most vulnerable voices in society, people banished to Gab for their political beliefs. They literally work for the liberal ruling system.

> most vulnerable voices It's really sad you apparently posted this seriously.

I'd like your thoughts on why their political beliefs are not vulnerable.

Re: The internet didn’t kill counterculture – you just won’t find it on Instagram

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can ship a 30 year old paperback of it for my personal use to my home for 60$, that is true. I'm not sure what else you are trying to tell me. Do you personally think that is a good offer?

I think it's genuinely ridiculous; academics working on really important topics for the current age, from society, to legal theory, to anthropology, to novel engineering are gatekept by publishers. I've wanted to read the full text to a paper I thought I will gain a lot from, something I can cite in an argument, something to enrich me and make me think. I can't do that, because I don't have access to the paper/book/w…

In a sense some may find this more of a band-aid than anything else, but I've found 95% of the book I want to read are available through libgen[0] and close to 99% of papers through sci-hub [1]. Sure enough, the book referenced in the great-great grandparent to your post is on libgen and I now have a PDF.

It really is unfortunate though, that there are a great many books one can only get a physical copy of for many times what they originally cost.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Genesis [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sci-Hub

Post reply on HN