Live data from Hacker News

You're a Slave to Money, Then You Die

churchlifejournal.nd.edu

241–243 of 243 posts

Re: You're a Slave to Money, Then You Die

#241
post #239
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not the ultimate authority but will try. I actually think you can find those answers and much more, eventually, via the links at my site including to official and other sources, but: 1. 2nd bullet here: http://lukecall.net/e9223372036854587340.html , etc: I was born to it, but my ancestors on various branches went through a process of investigation and prayer to decide for themselves, and really I had to do the…

Luke, I'm impressed and grateful for the high effort you put into responding to my rather low effort questions. Thank you.

Maybe the most important thing you can get from me is that I have learned for myself -- I know it is true, and you can too.

Re: You're a Slave to Money, Then You Die

#242
post #239
post #236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am not the ultimate authority but will try. I actually think you can find those answers and much more, eventually, via the links at my site including to official and other sources, but: 1. 2nd bullet here: http://lukecall.net/e9223372036854587340.html , etc: I was born to it, but my ancestors on various branches went through a process of investigation and prayer to decide for themselves, and really I had to do the…

Luke, I'm impressed and grateful for the high effort you put into responding to my rather low effort questions. Thank you.

I'm pretty sure the Church is where you are: you can go and see, ask questions in person, etc.

Re: You're a Slave to Money, Then You Die

#243

Other than the author having the ability to use large words I'm not sure what I was supposed to have come away with from this piece at all, it's just word salad.

Well, professor of humanities there. Accusing them of using large words or "having swallowed a dictionary" (like one of the siblings here) is getting dangerously close to an ad-hominem. He presents some content. Not in the easiest form, maybe, but you're insinuating there's nothing else in there, when really it's more of a refusal on your part to engage.

The guy you are answering to was asking if there is more content than the title. but considering the comments it does not incite me to read the actual article
Post reply on HN