Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

blog.mozilla.org

241–250 of 278 posts

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#241

All this does is cause advertisers to look at more advances mechanisms to track users and make it 'mainstream' -- like browser fingerprinting. These are also not explictly governed by existing legislation, so they can also worry about things like cookie laws and there's little to no defense.

So the usual arms race between people and advertisers?

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#242
post #2

>For new users who install and download Firefox for the first time, Enhanced Tracking Protection will automatically be set on by default as part of the ‘Standard’ setting in the browser and will block known “third-party tracking cookies” according to the Disconnect list. Despite other issues, which there are some, I'm really happy to see FF not only enable more ways for users to protect themselves - but to be rolling…

My parents are completely tech illiterate. But they are also afraid of this tracking and becoming much more aware of this power. So they ask me to set up their browsers to do so. I don't go full in, but basic stuff. There are still little hiccups but even they are happier to have small hiccups than be tracked. They see it as a fair trade-off. I think this attitude is common non-technical users. Tldr: I fully support…

[deleted]

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#243
post #167
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox is fast enough for most people, it has a UI as good as Chrome (that maybe is shit for some people, however most people don't care), most people don't care if Pocket is included or not (it is not like Firefox keeps nagging you to use it either). The only point I concur with you is that all sites should work, however the majority of times I see a site broken in Firefox is because of the developer not testing in…

Why should the developers worry about a browser that is only covering 10% as I remember that is the cover ? Specially if you have a small team who has time and people to make multiple versions to run on different browsers? You can just put a banner saying this website works well on chrome. FF should be more active in making all the sites work on their browser.

> You can just put a banner saying this website works well on chrome.

Indeed Chrome is the new IE

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you recommend for adblocking on Safari?

uBlock Origin, same as anywhere else. https://safari-extensions.apple.com/details/?id=com.el1t.uBl...

That's depreciated and won't work in the next Safari version, along with all other normal Safari Extensions.

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#245
Sorry but I can't make the switch from chrome to ff because I don't buy ff's agenda any more than I do Google's. Neither is in the browser game to make money from great browser product.

I want someone to be as dedicated to the product as id was to doom. I want to be able to use their browser for free for a year or three. If I still like you then I'll mary you. Then I'll pay a yearly fee for as long as I live.

Edit: until you start to act a fool. If you do then you're out. Can someone please create this product?

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#246

I'm not sure why the "Multi Account Containers" are not built into the browser but I found this add-on to be a motivating factor in switching to FF. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account...

When I first tried to switch to from Chrome to Firefox, I got frustrated by the different approaches to user profiles, but multi-containers fixed it for me. Chrome makes it easy to switch profiles/accounts with the account button in the top right, but Firefox profile management is clunky. You have to choose on startup and can’t launch a window with a different profile from the browser itself. Next time I tried, I fou…

> - Profile stuff like History and bookmarks is shared across containers and securely synced with client side encryption by default.

That's actually why I prefer the full profile option in Firefox (i.e. running 'firefox -p' and selecting a profile). I don't want shared history across profiles.

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#247

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I would love to switch to safari. What do you use for ad-blocking?

UBlock Origin supports Safari: https://safari-extensions.apple.com/details/?id=com.el1t.uBl...

It seems like it's won't be working on Safari for much longer. Info from 2 days ago "I can confirm that on macOS Catalina Developer Beta 1, uBlock Origin is completely removed as it is not using the MAS distribution method." Src: https://github.com/el1t/uBlock-Safari/issues/151

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#248
post #34

I've dumped Chrome altogether since FF 67 was released. My only gripe is they still aren't blocking ALL ads, but regardless it's a way better user experience now than it ever was. Firefox 67 feels like a whole new beast compared to their older versions. If you haven't tried FF for a while I recommend doing so and I suggest trying it across multiple devices. The tab management, syncing, pinning and sending etc. across…

Firefox doesn’t block ads by default, but you can install uBlock Origin, the best ad blocker available. I also recommend Privacy Badger. It’s a neat extension that automatically detects trackers by auto-learning. This means that Privacy Badger will catch trackers that aren’t caught by static lists, like what Firefox and uBlock Origin are doing. Btw, both these extensions I mentioned are now deprecated in Chrome due t…

personally, i hate extensions -- they have a bad track record overall. if i install an extension, i have to keep watching it to be sure it hasn't been sold to a third-party datamining company. same problem with phone apps, but at least phones offer permissions controls for apps.

i trust ublock origin because gorhill is very public, passionate, and transparent. i trust privacy badger because it's backed by the EFF's reputation. those are two very high bars to set and they are literally the only two extensions i trust enough to install on my machine.

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#249
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They can't and likely won't ever block ALL ads because they are funded through a search contract with Google. The whole point of that contract is to drive ad revenue.

As netizens, is there a way to replace Mozilla's dependence on another private company for revenue? Govt grants? Or is merely donations the only way?

mozilla foundation (the non-profit) accepts donations, but not (afaik) the part of mozilla that develops firefox.

Re: Firefox Now Available with Enhanced Tracking Protection by Default

#250

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox doesn’t block ads by default, but you can install uBlock Origin, the best ad blocker available. I also recommend Privacy Badger. It’s a neat extension that automatically detects trackers by auto-learning. This means that Privacy Badger will catch trackers that aren’t caught by static lists, like what Firefox and uBlock Origin are doing. Btw, both these extensions I mentioned are now deprecated in Chrome due t…

personally, i hate extensions -- they have a bad track record overall. if i install an extension, i have to keep watching it to be sure it hasn't been sold to a third-party datamining company. same problem with phone apps, but at least phones offer permissions controls for apps. i trust ublock origin because gorhill is very public, passionate, and transparent. i trust privacy badger because it's backed by the EFF's r…

Mozilla's repository of extensions has a better track record than Chrome Web Store, as Mozilla does reviews, plus it's now a smaller target.

They survived for years without a permissions system in place. I'm glad that's now in place though.

I always felt uncomfortable letting random extensions active in Private Mode.

Post reply on HN