Earlier quoted context omitted.
> isn't immune Why all-or-nothing? The fact is that free software has transparency as one of its advantages. When software is closed-source, its users must rely on the developers to maintain that software.
I completely agree it is an advantage and I'm very happy there are options that are mostly Open Source (I say mostly because I'm not a fan of binary drivers, which are often a necessity for decent performance or features). > Why all-or-nothin? The parent was citing the existence of a few specific bugs in macOS and Open Source as an alternative (implying it wasn't vulnerable). I really think the "given enough eyeballs…
That may be true, but the alternative is certainly worse.