Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wouldn't surprise me. Superficial reading is an ongoing danger of text-based support. The other day, my wife used Amazon's chat support to ask a question about what would happen if she canceled her free Prime trial. The rep said: give me two minutes to look into this. And then came back with: I've canceled your Prime as you requested, thanks, gtfo. She managed to unwind this after a great deal of effort, but man.
Reminds me of when I called my cell phone carrier, to have an unused line dropped from my account. Had to give them my phone number, and the number for the line to remove. "Ok, hold on one second..." [click]. Phone didn't work any more -- they removed the wrong line. Had to go to a land line, and hang on hold for 30 minutes to get someone to start restoring my account (and to make sure I didn't lose my grandfathered…
I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
241–250 of 447 posts
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#242Recap as I understand it, since the blog post isn't 0. Buyer purchased item from third-party seller on Amazon 1. Seller picked a name and address in buyer's town, from an obituary, and sent parcel containing two baking mats thereto ( instead of camera lens ) 2. Occupant of that address signed for it believing it to be for the deceased relative 3. USPS updated status to 'delivered' with signature and address recorded…
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#243You can file a complaint at https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.a... or by calling 1-800-ASK-USPS
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#244Recap as I understand it, since the blog post isn't 0. Buyer purchased item from third-party seller on Amazon 1. Seller picked a name and address in buyer's town, from an obituary, and sent parcel containing two baking mats thereto ( instead of camera lens ) 2. Occupant of that address signed for it believing it to be for the deceased relative 3. USPS updated status to 'delivered' with signature and address recorded…
Lana is usually a female name, isn't it? Not that it much matters, they still appear to be jerks.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
A couple of possibilities: *The customer service reps have to answer a huge volume of cases and they really don't take time to read the email *It's ingrained into the customer service reps to follow policy to a T. So if it was signed for, deny. *They're using some sort of automated system that shows whether something was signed for. If 'yes', deny.
I still use Amazon because of the convenience and because the vast majority of the time I never have to deal with their customer service, but in the rare instances I do I've noticed that over the past few years Amazon has become very Google-like in terms of putting everything behind systems that are either automated or may as well be (strict script-following offshore customer service). There used to be useful links (…
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#246Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I never buy from third-party sellers in Amazon Does it actually make any sense now? Wasn't it confirmed many times that Amazon just ship it to you from closest warehouse even if it's item by 3rd party seller?
AFAIK there are three kind of items: 1. Sold and shipped by Amazon 2. Sold by third-party, fulfilled by Amazon 3. Sold and shipped by third-party I never buy (3) and generally avoid (2) when there is a possibility of counterfeit, but otherwise I agree with you (2) is fine.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#247Recap as I understand it, since the blog post isn't 0. Buyer purchased item from third-party seller on Amazon 1. Seller picked a name and address in buyer's town, from an obituary, and sent parcel containing two baking mats thereto ( instead of camera lens ) 2. Occupant of that address signed for it believing it to be for the deceased relative 3. USPS updated status to 'delivered' with signature and address recorded…
At no point did I encounter anything resembling the Kafkaesque web of strategic incompetence that I half expected. They followed up every step of the way with courtesy and professionalism even though the seller had woven a substantially more convincing lie than in OP's case -- they had a many year history of selling equipment and radio astronomy books along with two previous successful VNA sales. Evidently it was an account hijack. In this price bracket, even a solid account history isn't a guarantee.
I no longer resent the 10% cut eBay takes. They saved my bacon on this one. It sounds like Amazon's team could learn a thing or two from eBay.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#248I like how this list is zero-indexed.
Liking zero indexed lists is such a dumb programmer meme. Lists are for humans to read and therefore should use the natural numbers, which start at one. Arrays are zero indexed because the first item of the array starts with zero offset.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
It sounded to me like you already had all of this figured out. Why do you suddenly need to be a federal officer?
> I would just contact amazon and find out where the money went I like to think that Amazon won't give its users bank details to random people. A federal officer could force them give it up.
Re: I Fell Victim to a $1,500 Used Camera Lens Scam on Amazon
#250I was thinking about getting defective product shipped etc but never thought I could have faced such a sophisticated scam.