Earlier quoted context omitted.
Almost always, nobody has any intention to "make it run buggy." It's about making it run well on platforms you care about (and officially support), and ignoring the others. Complicated software is usually fragile enough that it will have similar results.
Simple solution, do not do preferential treatment based on one's OS.
Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
241–250 of 492 posts
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#242Earlier quoted context omitted.
And what if some programmers are put unto fixing this, to realise the normal code path has a number of other bugs for linux? If you write web software you clearly define what you support and what you do not. I've fallen into the "I know this browser is not supported, but everything works except for X" trap. Where you first spend a month fixing other bugs that also don't work, only to end up with a more complex QA dev…
It's true, but the flip side is don't offer a web based product if you can't support a wide range of web browsers on multiple OSes. This gives me flashbacks to old (hopefuly dying) "web based" enterprise apps that were browser accessible only by a one magic version of windows explorer with a giant slew of automatically downloaded browser extensions. Just produce an app if that's all that can be supported.
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#243Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#244Remember when I said "mark my words, MS hasn't changed!"? Side note: in this thread, users who mention events of decades past (ie, they are experienced) tend to be more critical of MS.
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#245Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that's another case of assuming bad intentions. Once Microsoft had a slightly differently behaving version of JavaScript that was in use by hundreds of millions of people, including many enterprise environments with internally developed and bought solutions that required Internet Explorer and it's version of JS and ActiveX to function who more often than not were also large Microsoft customers, the idea of br…
For one, every Linux distribution comes with either Firefox or Chromium preinstalled. Is that monopolistic behaviour? Should EU require Linux developer to provide "Choose your web browser" wizard popping up on every new Linux install, similar way it is on Windows?
False. See, for instance, Arch.
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#246All hail the "new" Microsoft, still using the old anticompetitive tricks from the DOS era.
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#247Earlier quoted context omitted.
I found that interesting too. I'm not familiar with office 365, but isn't it web based? So why does it matter what browser or OS you use?
If the one creating a product also creates a OS, making that product run faster on your OS compared to others makes your OS look better I guess.
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#248Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#249Earlier quoted context omitted.
Whenever I google a problem with a microsoft product, and the search ends up on one of these answer.microsoft.com pages, I always click on the link with an enormous feeling of dread. I don't think I've ever seen a usable answer on that site.
At least there is an occasional employee commenting. Have you seen the Google support forums? Google promotes normal users to moderators on their support forums if they just post enough, so instead of being brushed off by some underpaid employee you are being ignored and ridiculed by someone not even being paid to!
Re: Onedrive is slow on Linux but fast with a “Windows” user-agent (2016)
#250Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah after reading some other comments (also on reddit) the idea that they push fixes platform specific and linux just defaults to a state with many missing fixes sounds like a reasonable option.
So they supposedly maintain duplicate version of core functions in plateform specific branch and never merge them to master... That would only be slightly less worse than the sabotaging theory.