Earlier quoted context omitted.
> As for Quinn, no on here is talking about her or harassment other than the anti-GGers. I've been talking about Kotaku. You brought up Kotaku in response to this post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10253942 The context is very specifically Zoe Quinn. > In response to ethical breaches in your articles (opposed to your activism which I've broken down already), What "activism" have you "broken down"? > I'd say a…
> You do understand, right, that your standards and expectations for disclosure have nothing to do with any recognized standard for journalistic ethics, right? Pulitzer disagrees with you. From http://pulitzercenter.org/about-us/ethics-and-standards-poli... CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Normal activities - outside work, investments, political activism - pose special problems for journalists. Often, it's best to avoid activit…
No they don't.
> Full disclosure of relevant information is standard practice for the Pulitzer Center
Wake me when political or economic writers disclose which candidates and politicians they know and voted for, or when film writers disclose the names of all the PR people who they talk to, or any of the other relationships that aren't routinely disclosed because they're not material. "relevant information" does not mean "anything and everything".
I repeat: your standards and expectations for disclosure have nothing to do with any recognized standard for journalistic ethics.