Earlier quoted context omitted.
insurance doesn't work unless it's universal. it just falls apart once either side picks and chooses. the young people don't buy it, and then they fall off their bike and they're screwed. and the insurers can't get stuck with just sick people, they have the whole pre-existing condition thing, so your kids get sick and you can't leave your job. a sick person looking for treatment is the opposite of everything that mak…
That's more than a bit of a strawman you've constructed. I for one am willing to admit that I'm not smart enough to construct a path to a "free market" (a phrase I've never used in this discussion till this message) system after three quarters of a century of massive government intervention. Heck, it would require an end to "democracy", and/or a few generations of radically changed public schooling, and/or "reeducati…
We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
231–239 of 239 posts
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#232http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2013/07/government-gives-cont...
http://ducknetweb.blogspot.com/2013/07/obama-administration-...
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please do not let this discourage you. The stories are, sadly, quite accurate depending on which company you work for (there are better situations than bodyshops) but we can't afford to give up. Dive in and help change things. This is a monumental challenge that requires more people that know a better way and are willing to act.
I agree that some suck less than others but being a government contractor will always suck more than working in private industry (even as a contractor). Just to not be a totally cynical asshole, I have heard NOAA is actually pretty modernized and efficient and everyone I've talked to seemed to be happy working there. I'd also add that while the place I was at had its share of crap, the government for the most part lo…
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Extra fun side notes: While holding a technical discussion about current tasking with a coworker in a "hallway meeting" our boss's boss and the gov-manager-who-signed-the-contract walked by. I was later reprimanded for chit chatting too much instead of working. Another issue, due to some contract specifics and my life situation I was able to decline healthcare coverage from my employer and I received that in salary c…
Another one: We had a government employee who was responsible for building our mess of a Java project (it was done by hand). It was error prone due to some self-referential build requirements, and the deployment of projects had to be done in a specific order. Generally a deploy took a couple tries. While I was there I skunkworks-implemented Jenkins CI (nee Hudson at the time) to deflect constantly getting blamed for…
One of the engagements I get called to once a week involves dealing with some gov employees. It had the odd property of continuing when the shutdown hit, so its the contractors and no gov people. Productivity on the project is completely unaffected. Half of the workforce gone, no change in productivity. There are certainly less meetings, so that's nice.
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
"As many as 20 million "tried to" sign up, based on their extrapolation of some polling data." The quote refers to "single digits" and it is ridiculous. If even close to 20 million people tried to sign up then that means many millions of citizens need this coverage and will likely end up getting it because having health insurance is critical to their livelihood. Am I to believe 20 million people needed health insuran…
We seem to be having completely different arguments. At no point did I say there was no demand for Obamacare. I'm saying the government has shown a remarkable level of incompetence at running what's essentially a simple lead gen website. I'm also suggesting that this probably doesn't bode well for the successful administration of the program. Regarding your second point, it's become somewhat of a meme in the press th…
My second point stands. Your experience of the media coverage, while valid, doesn't necessarily represent fact. You have to admit it is possible that a reporter managed to interview someone who signed up and you and your news sources were unaware. Even if you proved this point to be true what does it say? No one has signed up? People don't want to be interviewed? Obamacare will fail? I don't get it.
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#236I told https://www.healthcare.gov/ that I want to apply and live in New York. It immediately gave me a link to http://nystateofhealth.ny.gov/ . I clicked the link, and it says: > Access Denied > You don't have permission to access " http://nystateofhealth.ny.gov/" on this server. Why would the top level of such a site have permissions at all?
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#237https://www.healthcare.gov/marketplace/global/en_US/js/ee/du... https://www.healthcare.gov/marketplace/global/en_US/registra...
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
To play devils advocate, have you tried logging into Aetna, Cigna, Blue Cross Blue Shield, etc recently? Just as fucked in terms of passwords being screwed, lockouts, other such nonsense.
No, but I've signed in to Facebook, Google, Reddit, etc. It's a solved problem.
Re: We paid $634 million for the Obamacare sites and all we got was this lousy 404
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sounds awesome! I'll put in a bid, then hire the cheapest programmers I can to make it look like I did some work, then of course I'll lose the competition and still get paid for 3 months. Repeat and you have a viable business. And you never need to actually support software after the 3 months is up.
Well, you wouldn't let anyone enter the process: there'd still have to be an initial filter. After that, presumably promise of much much higher future profits for the full contract and prestige (i.e. the free advertising that would come from having done it) would be sufficient. But it was just an idea anyway.