The article now says "[UPDATE, SATURDAY 8 AUGUST: Consider this entire story retracted for now. Details forthcoming.]"
App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours
231–233 of 233 posts
Re: App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was not assuming bad faith, I was interpreting your meaning based on the words you said. I’m also an iOS developer and while there are a lot of things about the app review process that should be changed, I wouldn’t describe any of my reviewers as clueless. Maybe you’ve submitted more apps than me, though, and maybe you got a bad one. Like you said, app volumes are huge, so that’s probably a statistical inevitabilit…
> I was not assuming bad faith, I was interpreting your meaning based on the words you said. Where exactly does "to be a contrarian" or "to hate on Apple" come from my words? That was bad faith psychological speculation, not an interpretation of my words. You said that I purposefully misinterpreted the meaning of the quote. That is literally assuming bad faith. I'm not sure what you think assuming bad faith is, if no…
[deleted]
Re: App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours
#233> But that’s not what happened at all. Godier proceeded through a series of escalations up to the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.” > It has no tarot function, no horoscopes, and nothing that I, or anyone else I’ve asked, would associate with astrology. I hav…
this often works even if you did in fact have “tarot function” and didnt remove it
Sounds like the self checkout at Kroger when it sees the wrong weight on the bagging carousel.
Just jiggle the carousel a bit and it lets you proceed.