Live data from Hacker News

I Stopped “Creating Content”

refactoringenglish.com

231–240 of 249 posts

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You wrote all that without mentioning Marshall McLuhan? ;) Also, I really like your artwork! I've bookmarked that link.

I don’t really consider him to be actually relevant, when discussing organic creativity.

Fair. It was indeed a throwaway comment and after I wrote it, medium is the message doesn't exactly work with what you are saying. For example, and author writing a novel on a legal pad, the legal pad is the not the final medium being "consumed."

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#232
post #168

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"so that it gets “traffic”, another form of goo that gets “funneled” and “converted” into money." How is this any different from a small business hot dog stand, setting up outside a game to get more of the "traffic" instead of paying rent somewhere busy. You're a small business trying to get eyeballs, you do what you gotta do and call it what you want, instead of paying for ads like the big boys.

Hot dog stands don't often masquerade as creative expression.

who gets to define what's real creative expression and what's not?

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The entirety of that compilation of words is worth a read. I recommend checking out "Artificial Intelligence", "Consume", "Consumer" and "Monetize", "Players" and "Product"

Agree on a lot of this but not AI; it's already aged like milk. In my view, you don't get to dismiss LLMs as "stochastic parrots" unless you can argue with precisely defined terms why you ain't one.

Reading that article I feel almost like he's trying to defend the honor of the MIT AI Lab more than anything else. Fitting given he already died on that hill last time with Marvin Minsky.

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#235
post #169

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I've always disliked this saying. People have agency . They can always refuse to play the game (and that is precisely what many great people chose to do).

Refusing to play the game just means you lose the game. It isn't a third state, it's a resignation.

You can't resign from a position you never held or a game you never entered into

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t really consider him to be actually relevant, when discussing organic creativity.

Fair. It was indeed a throwaway comment and after I wrote it, medium is the message doesn't exactly work with what you are saying. For example, and author writing a novel on a legal pad, the legal pad is the not the final medium being "consumed."

We’re really talking about two media, here.

The media of creation, and the media of consumption.

Valid discussion.

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#237

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A long time ago Simon Peyton Jones said Haskell tries to "avoid success at all costs". He was being cheeky, but it honestly is how I try and approach most of what I do that isn't directly related to my employment (as a software person). My blog posts are just for me; I don't market them, I don't expect anyone else to read them, I don't spam links to all my friends every time I post anything. I have no idea if my writ…

Software engineers, or at least the well compensated ones, are living proof that some level of UBI is beneficial. Look at all the works we have collectively created just because we don't have to worry about basic needs and actually have enough time and energy left to do the things we care about. Imagine if other professions had such luxury. Teachers in particular I'm very curious about. I also think that the Cambrian…

I would argue a large percentage of us are creatives and that might have driven us to software engineering. That’s the case for me, at least. I love many other creative things but selected software for my job.

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure if they're irrational. Payment/subscription fatigue is a thing. Today it seems like you have to pay to breathe. It's suffocating. I often go through periods where I reject every money ask compulsively, the same way as I would "disconnect". It's quite interesting how quality of life gets inverted in non intuitive ways. If you travel to a "developing country" you notice you are no longer bombarded with ads…

If it costs the audience something, they're demonstrating their sincerity. So one problem with giving stuff away for free is that you might doubt how much your fans really mean it. Maybe they're just taking free stuff on principle, maybe they're praising you for the pleasure of giving praise, if they don't put their money where their mouth is. Maybe I don't sincerely care about a lot of the free stuff I say I enjoy,…

idk, taking free stuff on principle is not a thing that's done everywhere. Time is costly. Reading crap content costs me more than the money I'd pay for it.

Re: I Stopped “Creating Content”

#239
post #3

For me the term users sometimes sounds similar to traffic. I prefer customers - that you serve with your product.

Even in a commercial context they aren't the same. The user is who sits in front of the screen, and the customer is who you have to please to make money.

You're right. But, nowadays these terms get more context meaning. For example - a user is someone who platforms sell their data to customers. Or a user is someone gullible you trick into making decisions that are good for the business. The literal term of someone who is using your system/product has evolved.
Post reply on HN