231–240 of 534 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Similar to anti-AI derangement
No. There is no "anti-AI derangement", the reaction to slop is normal.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you basing this opinion on the issue or actual evidence? Because this github link, although interesting, is almost completely context free on what the drama is beyond "Claude". The rsync maintainers could be anywhere on the spectrum from the perfect and responsible maintainer to incompetent children and we couldn't really tell.
> is almost completely context free on what the drama is beyond "Claude" As soon as it happened their rsync based backup system that was working before started to fail. It says right there.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Then somebody screenshots the geographical location "Israel" to attack another commenter. He gets lots of upvotes for it, too. And you got downvoted for calling out that crap. A sad state this world is in.
Yep. When someone does that, he gets rightfully called out. On the other side, accusations of being Russian trol are pretty common, even here on HN. Why are people more sensitive to antisemitism than to antislavism? Double standards, or just a hate induced by decades / centuries of indoctrination?
Calling someone a vatnik or Russian troll is mostly because the statement that provokes such a callout reproduces Russian propaganda talking points, and Russia has been running propaganda campaigns for well over a decade now. Similarly, ordinary Russians aren't called orcs, but Russian soldiers are called that because of their despicable behavior in the war theatre.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> this is a very senior open source contributer who has maintained this project since he came up with the diff algorithm during his Phd People change. You can be Linus Torvalds for all I care, if one day you wake up and start pushing 9000 line commits created by LLM and with regressions, you're not that person anymore.
But DID anything change? Of course I know that some people can just becoming psychotic out of nowhere. But why would I assume it?
A change in the sys calls that are used. That's pretty sensitive in general I think; I can see if it were introduced by an LLM why people would be upset if they experienced data loss from it.
Genuinely wondering though: is the problem that the patch was vibe coded, or is that no one reviewed the changes?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> this is a very senior open source contributer who has maintained this project since he came up with the diff algorithm during his Phd People change. You can be Linus Torvalds for all I care, if one day you wake up and start pushing 9000 line commits created by LLM and with regressions, you're not that person anymore.
But DID anything change? Of course I know that some people can just becoming psychotic out of nowhere. But why would I assume it?
The significant thing that will result from this is private issue lists and disabling open PRs. and then you’re worse off as an ai sceptic.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bugs are bugs and need fixing. How dense can people get.
Regressions are bad and need to not happen.
Regressions should be fixed expediently, but if you apply the criteria "need to not happen" they are literally blocking issues. They could then block security fixes.