Live data from Hacker News

Grok 4.3

docs.x.ai

231–240 of 608 posts

Re: Grok 4.3

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

> so of course grok is fine talking about it. Probably even offers strategies for them does free accounting has money laundering strategies etc...

The slander comes in when you assume Elon knew and was complicit with their crimes to the point he'd intentionally normalize it as a discussion topic in Grok. You even went so far as to say it's willing to assist in committing crimes.

Re: Grok 4.3

#232
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm so sorry your family is suffering from this. I hope you can find a way to bring them back. Disorders featuring psychosis are so painful for everyone around them. Blessings to you and your family

I love how you guys downvote all the old comments to make them hidden from search. My no-name account rarely gets downvoted. But, within 20 minutes of posting this, I drop 10 points. Rando accounts

I upvoted both of your comments. I also cannot downvote anything.

Re: Grok 4.3

#233
post #57

So, we have: - claude for corps and gov - codex for devs - grok for what, roleplay, racism? Those are the two things I've ever heard grok associated with around me.

So interestingly, I know of at least one application in a charity that deals with trafficking where grok was happy to do one-shot classification tasks where all other models refused to cooperate. I think there's a surprising number of actually useful applications in this sort of grey area for a slightly-less guardrailed, near-frontier model (also the grok-fast models are cheap!).

Gemini especially has a habit of blocking my pretty mundane requests, claiming they’re attempts to jailbreak or create malicious code.

Grok also does quite well at code reviews in my experience because it’s not so aggressively ”aligned”.

Re: Grok 4.3

#235

[flagged]

[flagged]

You are smart enought to post on hn but not smart enough to have an argument?

Please learn to read and start reading:

1984, Animal Farm, Brave new World, "How fascism works, and how to stop it: Dehumanizing people is the first and last step in a fascist society", Wikipedia: 2 World War, Concentration camps, ...

Re: Grok 4.3

#236
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure Twitter knows which are the bot accounts and is surely excluding them from their model training. Twitter bots aren't a new phenomenon after all.

I don't think Twitter/X know for sure who the bots are, since Elon has been pretty vocal about trying to stop them for ages, yet I still get lots of spam DMs (as do others with far fewer followers/reach). Even if 95% of the spam gets actively reported and dealt with, that still leaves a ton of nonsense on the platform, getting fed into the LLM. And spam has only gotten worse over the years, as the barrier to entry ha…

I'd have guessed that at least some of the bots are Twitter itself, trying to draw you in with some sense of engagement. Given that Musk is the owner, and everything we know about him and have seen him do, I'd not be surprised if some of the MAGA bots are his too.

Re: Grok 4.3

#237
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Isn't it exhausting to view everything an ideological lens instead of reviewing technical achievements on their merits?

It's very exhausting! But Elon Musk chose to leverage his fortune from Tesla and SpaceX into an ideological project to destroy a lot of things I care about, so he's left me no choice. If he'd like people to review his work on its technical merits, shouldn't he at the bare minimum apologize and promise not to do it again?

Re: Grok 4.3

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know either, I don't see the correlation with X and Musk either, as if he is the one developing the platform and not thousand of workers and leaders. What does the CEO of a platform has to do with what people post on it? The CEO of HN is responsible for what you just posted? Kinda funny how people are selective about it, when you land on a website, you check who is in charge of it and for each CEO change you…

There's only thing I find sadder than untouchable billionaires that never see any consequences for their actions: the people who think they need to stick up for them. > What does the CEO of a platform has to do with what people post on it? That CEO is actively promoting political viewpoints (via his account, his platform and his AI model) that are detrimental to my country and the way I want to live my life. > When y…

I'm not from the US so I don't really care, X is an international platform and almost all the content I see isn't US related (which kinda make me think that people should just set their account from outside of the US to just avoid this?), but from your point of view, it seems more of a disagreement of beliefs, wouldn't this reasoning apply for your beliefs as well? If the CEO of a certain platform was agreeing with your beliefs but 50% of the population don't, you are practically saying that people disagreering should boycott said platform, but isn't that how you just end discourse between people and create an echo-chamber?

Re: Grok 4.3

#239
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Grok for furthering the far-right filter bubble Elon has been hard at work building.

[flagged]

I don't remember any far-left opinions being popular there. Was stuff like worker's revolution or public ownership of the means of production ever in the Twitter mainstream?

Re: Grok 4.3

#240

So, we have: - claude for corps and gov - codex for devs - grok for what, roleplay, racism? Those are the two things I've ever heard grok associated with around me.

There was an AI roundtable on HN front page 2-3 months back. Someone made an outlier analysis and put it on his github.

Guess which LLM was the top outlier and about what type of questions it disagreed with all other LLMs...

Post reply on HN