Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Maybe the default settings are too high

raptitude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 332 posts

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#231

Post by ghaff »

awesome_dude wrote: post #186
ghaff wrote: post #106

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not really a resort person. But I do subscribe to some travel feeds mostly in the vein of maybe finding some places/attractions/restaurants/etc. that I'm not familiar with. The number of hyper-scheduled spreadsheets I see is amazing. Doesn't mean I don't often have some itinerary and even book some particular, popular attractions/venues. But the 30-minute block scheduling is something I do for work (if that). ADD…

I have an upcoming trip planned in asia - never been before. My firm rule is - have a loose plan, aim for one activity per day, an emergency option, or two, if the weather plays up, and that's it. It's the type of plan that has worked for every holiday that I have taken that involves a different city to the one I live in.

I think that's a good plan. I do tend to book hotels, planes, and usually longer trains. But, especially for a longer city trip, I loosely map out--even if just mentally--things I want to see and do but, for example, one museum a day is mostly enough unless another convenient one is small.

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#232

Post by ervine »

Tepix wrote: post #147

This us why I consider sailing to be the best way of travelling the world: You're slow to begin with and the wind dictates your plans. You really don't want to be motoring. Instead you have time to experience the land, the people and the ocean. Preferably without being online constantly.

This is why I love cycling so much.

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#234

Post by mathattack »

The best books improve with rereading and slower reading. Tolkien fits this. I had an English teacher who reread LOTR every summer. I’m not there, but I am on a 5ish year cycle.

Most books are the other way. Zoom through and you can get most of the value. This is especially true of non-fiction, where most have a message that can be gleaned in 15 minutes. (The exceptions are the great ones)

Podcasts are similar. Most give you 80% of the value at 2X speed. Even my favorites - I’d rather speed listen to get 80% the value rather than get 100% of half the backlog. The best podcasts defy this too.

So in the end it’s a bit of a skill to both choose the right things to slow down on, and then a discipline to force the appropriate speed.

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#235

Post by BloondAndDoom »

powvans wrote: post #11

I find walking can be a similar experience. It really crystalized for me this summer while walking the Camino de Santiago because of the effect of exploring another country. When you walk, you see everything. The world is huge. Everything is slower, higher fidelity, and for me, richer. You can spend an entire day walking from one town to another. Think of everything you will see! Compare this to driving. Driving is l…

I love walking and couple of years ago I moved to LA. I fucking hate how hard to walk in this city. I always knew I liked walking but I didn’t realize how crucial it was for mental health (I grew up around Europe, purely on walkable cities and didn’t get my driving license until 30,years old or something)

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#237

Post by BloondAndDoom »

loloquwowndueo wrote: post #27
chilmers wrote: post #2

If you’re a fan of LOTR but don’t fancy reading it aloud yourself, I’d really recommend the new audio versions read by Andy Serkis. While I don’t vibe with every facet of his performance, overall it’s a tour-de-force, and really makes the prose come to life. Especially in those descriptive sections that it’s possible to glaze over when reading the text. Having an actor of the calibre of Serkis reading them to you bri…

Noooo. Audio books feed you the content at someone else’s pace, not at your (slow) pace, which is exactly what TFA advocates. Or, what are you going to do? Hit Pause after each sentence so you can fully digest and savor it?

Not the OP, but to me audio generally x2 slower than I read, so I’m content with the speed, anything slower than that would be weird pace for many stuff.

Having said that yes I do indeed pause if I need to take a moment to think, and I roll back 15 seconds if I want to hear it again. Not a big deal, just part of the experience. -signed ex-hater of audiobooks

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#238

Post by ghaff »

seanmcdirmid wrote: post #99
irishcoffee wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My spouse and I dealt with this on our honeymoon. We were both working 50-80 hour weeks for months leading up to our trip. The first day we got to this all-inclusive resort we spent the whole time trying to min/max and be as efficient and calculated as possible. It was a stressful, miserable day. Day two we looked at each other, had an adult beverage with breakfast, and relaxed for the rest of the trip.

I have a hard time doing anything when in a nice resort. If it’s too nice, you just want to hangout at your pool villa all day and enjoy the view.

And if you're presumably paying a premium for a nice resort, why wouldn't you spend a lot of your time taking advantage of it?

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#239

Post by matsemann »

fluoridation wrote: post #226
matsemann wrote: post #218

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What did you get out of this comment? What do you think a reader gets? Maybe follow the spirit of the article: slow down and pounder, be curious, maybe you would have gotten the right take away instead of being antagonizing towards someone's fond memory.

[flagged]

What makes HN so great is that it's curated towards curiosity. Not simple quibs. If the only value your comment has is to yourself, you could write it without pressing the submit button.

Re: Maybe the default settings are too high

#240

Post by harshreality »

delis-thumbs-7e wrote: post #180
gste wrote: post #175

By coincidence I also finished The Fellowship of the Ring about two weeks ago. I have always had the intuition about reading speed that it is very easy to be a speed reader if you skim over things. I've always questioned how much of speed reading is just skipping stuff and filtering for the most important word tokens. You could skip all of Tolkien's scenery descriptions, you could skip Tom Bombadil and Lothlorien and…

Although people think LoTR as a novel meant for younger people, it certainly is not an Tolkien never meant it that way and it certainly is not an easy text. It is far more complex than any fantasy I have ever come across. Tolkien was a top language scholar who spoke several even dead languages, so there’s a lot more going on than just the surface plot of Frodo “returning” Bilbo’s ring. One would be mad to simply skim…

One might also argue that The Little Prince is "far more complex" and deeper than anything written at a typical adult reading level. That lower linguistic surface complexity allows more space for the reader to explore ideas and themes.

I'm skeptical. Is there no more value to series like Gormenghast, Book of the New Sun, and The Second Apocalypse, beyond mere literary masochism, compared to LotR? Like them or not, LotR, as elaborate as its mythology is (if you include Silmarillion and some or all of the History of Middle Earth), is not at the same level.

Post reply on HN