Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

GPT Image 1.5

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 272 posts

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#231

Post by leumon »

vunderba wrote: post #102

Okay results are in for GenAI Showdown with the new gpt-image 1.5 model for the editing portions of the site! https://genai-showdown.specr.net/image-editing Conclusions - OpenAI has always had some of the strongest prompt understanding alongside the weakest image fidelity. This update goes some way towards addressing this weakness. - It's leagues better at making localized edits without altering the entire image's ae…

One other test you could add is generating a chessboard from a FEN. I was surprised to see NBP able to do that (however, it seems to only work with fewer pieces, after a certain amount it makes mistakes or even generates a completely wrong image) https://files.catbox.moe/uudsyt.png

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#232

Post by Forgeties79 »

vintermann wrote: post #229
Forgeties79 wrote: post #78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As a professional cinematographer/photographer I am incredibly uncomfortable with people using my art without my permission for unknown ends. Doubly so when it’s venture backed private companies stealing from millions of people like me as they make vague promises about the capabilities of their software trained on my work. It doesn’t take much to understand why that makes me uncomfortable and why I feel I am entitled…

> How do you feel about entities taking your face off of your personal website and plastering it on billboards smiling happily next to their product? That would be misrepresentation. Even Stallman isn't OK with that. You can take one of his opinion pieces and publish it as your own. Or you can attach his name to it. However, if you're editing it and releasing it under his name, clearly you're simply lying, and nobody…

If somebody is stealing from your bank account every week and you just don’t notice it, are you not being stolen from? Has nobody stolen your credit card and used it until the moment you notice the charges. I don’t really think we can go “if a tree fall in the forest and nobody is around to hear it…” about this.

Stallman has his opinions on software, I have my opinions on my visual work. I don’t get really how that applies here or why that settles this matter.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#233

Post by nisegami »

__alexs wrote: post #221
KeplerBoy wrote: post #211

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Remove all the trash from the street and sidewalk. Replace the sleeping person on the ground with a green street bench. Change the parking meter into a planted tree." What a prompt and image.

Looking forward to the first AR glasses to include live editing of the world like this.

How long until this shows up in a YC batch?

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#234

Post by Forgeties79 »

onraglanroad wrote: post #137
Forgeties79 wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sorry, but you'll just have to deal with it and get over it. You were fine until this bit.

They're still fine because they're right. You got to play the copyright game when the big corps were on your side. Now they're on the other side. Deal with it and get over it.

You are not entitled to my art. Comparing that to copyright abuse by large corporations is ridiculous.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#235

Post by vintermann »

Forgeties79 wrote: post #232
vintermann wrote: post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> How do you feel about entities taking your face off of your personal website and plastering it on billboards smiling happily next to their product? That would be misrepresentation. Even Stallman isn't OK with that. You can take one of his opinion pieces and publish it as your own. Or you can attach his name to it. However, if you're editing it and releasing it under his name, clearly you're simply lying, and nobody…

If somebody is stealing from your bank account every week and you just don’t notice it, are you not being stolen from? Has nobody stolen your credit card and used it until the moment you notice the charges. I don’t really think we can go “if a tree fall in the forest and nobody is around to hear it…” about this. Stallman has his opinions on software, I have my opinions on my visual work. I don’t get really how that a…

If someone steals from my bank account I certainly CAN notice it even if I don't immediately, and I'm certainly worse off.

That's such a bad straw man I wonder if you're really supporting the position you claim to be supporting. Maybe you're just trying to give it a bad name.

Your opinion isn't on visual work, but visual property. You don't demand to be paid for your work - your labor. Rather you traded that for the dream of being paid rent on a capital object, in perpetuity (or close enough). Artists lost to the power-mongers when we bit at that bait.

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#239

Post by ge96 »

ge96 wrote: post #126

I get the tech implementation is amazing, I wonder if it takes away from genuineness of events, like the Astronaut photo, I get it's just a joke/funny too but it's like a photo of you in a supercar vs. actually buying one. Or fake AI companions vs. real people. Beauty filters/skinny filters vs. actually being healthy.

thinking about this more it goes two ways for guys/girls, the guys can post pics of them doing crazy things on their Tinder up to the girl to decide if it's real or not

I'm not saying this as a critique against image generation as you can manually make these fake images but yeah

Ultimately I think it's good, makes people be real

Re: GPT Image 1.5

#240

Post by eterm »

bongodongobob wrote: post #206
eterm wrote: post #173

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The killer feature of LLMs is to be able to extrapolate what's really wanted from short descriptions. Look again at Gemini's output, it looks like an actual book cover, it looks like an illustration that could be found on a book. It takes on board corrections (albeit hilariously literaly). Look at GPT image's output, it doesn't look anything like a book cover, and when prompted to say it got it wrong, just doubles do…

What you want, and what you think image generation is, is impossible.

And yet we can see Gemini do what I wanted, so it's clearly not impossible.
Post reply on HN