Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.
US Tech Force
231–240 of 320 posts
Re: US Tech Force
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not true I was hired in under HQE accession in 2019 and made SES 4 equivalent with zero civilian time in service.
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/pay-admi... Doesn't sound like you're talking about General Schedule.
This new force could easily and legally acquire and pay through other schedules - happens all the time.
Re: US Tech Force
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
No 401k can ever match the beauty that is the TSP.
Left federal and my private 401k is 150% match up to 6%. Better than TSP in everything except fees, which are slightly higher. But that mattered a lot less than my pay, I was a GS-15 in a leadership role and took a role in the private sector for a 30% pay increase back into an individual contributor role. So much less work and a huge pay increase.
Oh that's actually really good. Beats a TSP for sure even with the fees. But from what I remember you're at a defense contractor - they probably have the best benefits plans overall in the US.
Re: US Tech Force
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
More seriously, one big difference is that USDS recognized that design is as important as technology. This org only wants engineering-types. > We're looking for expertise in software engineering, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data analytics, or technical project management. Strong problem-solving abilities and a passion for public service are essential.
https://americabydesign.gov/ Design is separate but equal .
Re: US Tech Force
#235That's a nice idea, so nice in fact that it already existed as 18F until they closed it under the guise of efficiency earlier this year and are now starting over.
Re: US Tech Force
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's just no path to home ownership in the DC area for the fed career path after the ZIRP era. A capable person would have to be insane or desperate given the economics alone.
DC has the highest per capita income of anywhere in the US (vs other states/territories), so when you realize federal workers are producing the most value for America the economics are at least a little better. If you look at relative economic slackers like workers of NYC and the private industry where less value is per capita created, it's a bit rougher.
This isn't from the Federal workers; it's from people working in contracting for the Feds or other similar roles.
Re: US Tech Force
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.
Re: US Tech Force
#238Earlier quoted context omitted.
Talk is cheap; actions are what matters. Based on their actions (or lack thereof), the group you're describing must be a very small minority indeed.
They aren't in Congress, they are working in the states, I would guess. The Republicans in Congress mostly volunteered for a spinectomy when Trump was elected again.
Re: US Tech Force
#239Is this just US Digital Service V2? https://www.usds.gov/
Yeah my first thought was that this already existed, was doing great work, and got canned by DOGE in favor of what appears to be a MUCH MUCH more expensive version of it here.
When I said, “Well, we already had that - the USDS. And what has DOGE done, specifically, to fix things?” it just went right over her head. Did not even land.
Re: US Tech Force
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> It's always easy to spot a person who has enclosed themselves in a political or ideological bubble. They're typically first to apply a label to a large group of people and then assume all the people with that label are the exact same. Your recent posting history here includes calling the entire European Union a "non-contributing toddler" to the world. Hmm.