Live data from Hacker News

US Tech Force

techforce.gov

231–240 of 320 posts

Re: US Tech Force

#231
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.

If you keep your issues with Trump private, you're complicit with those who follow him blindly.

Re: US Tech Force

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not true I was hired in under HQE accession in 2019 and made SES 4 equivalent with zero civilian time in service.

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/pay-admi... Doesn't sound like you're talking about General Schedule.

Correct and there’s no legal requirement to use the GS.

This new force could easily and legally acquire and pay through other schedules - happens all the time.

Re: US Tech Force

#233
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No 401k can ever match the beauty that is the TSP.

Left federal and my private 401k is 150% match up to 6%. Better than TSP in everything except fees, which are slightly higher. But that mattered a lot less than my pay, I was a GS-15 in a leadership role and took a role in the private sector for a 30% pay increase back into an individual contributor role. So much less work and a huge pay increase.

> my private 401k is 150% match up to 6%

Oh that's actually really good. Beats a TSP for sure even with the fees. But from what I remember you're at a defense contractor - they probably have the best benefits plans overall in the US.

Re: US Tech Force

#234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More seriously, one big difference is that USDS recognized that design is as important as technology. This org only wants engineering-types. > We're looking for expertise in software engineering, artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, data analytics, or technical project management. Strong problem-solving abilities and a passion for public service are essential.

https://americabydesign.gov/ Design is separate but equal .

Ha. Nice Brown v. Board pull.

Re: US Tech Force

#235

That's a nice idea, so nice in fact that it already existed as 18F until they closed it under the guise of efficiency earlier this year and are now starting over.

And USDS, which was specifically 2 year terms just like this, for actual experienced engineers at the top of GS15 pay. They destroyed USDS to pretend to reinvent it but with new worse humans.

Re: US Tech Force

#236
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's just no path to home ownership in the DC area for the fed career path after the ZIRP era. A capable person would have to be insane or desperate given the economics alone.

DC has the highest per capita income of anywhere in the US (vs other states/territories), so when you realize federal workers are producing the most value for America the economics are at least a little better. If you look at relative economic slackers like workers of NYC and the private industry where less value is per capita created, it's a bit rougher.

> DC has the highest per capita income of anywhere in the US

This isn't from the Federal workers; it's from people working in contracting for the Feds or other similar roles.

Re: US Tech Force

#237
post #175

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This feels like it needs a MAGA vs Republican distinction. There are plenty of Republicans who (privately) have issues with some things Trump is doing.

Absolutely not. Almost every non-MAGA Republican voice that served in federal public office has been ousted, and it's not like they were good to begin with.

Re: US Tech Force

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Talk is cheap; actions are what matters. Based on their actions (or lack thereof), the group you're describing must be a very small minority indeed.

They aren't in Congress, they are working in the states, I would guess. The Republicans in Congress mostly volunteered for a spinectomy when Trump was elected again.

Can you name any currently serving?

Re: US Tech Force

#239
post #146

Is this just US Digital Service V2? https://www.usds.gov/

Yeah my first thought was that this already existed, was doing great work, and got canned by DOGE in favor of what appears to be a MUCH MUCH more expensive version of it here.

I was having a conversation with a Trump-supporting relative, who was genuinely asking me, “Don’t you think it’s great that they put a bunch of [DOGE] engineers into the government to fix things?”

When I said, “Well, we already had that - the USDS. And what has DOGE done, specifically, to fix things?” it just went right over her head. Did not even land.

Re: US Tech Force

#240

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

> It's always easy to spot a person who has enclosed themselves in a political or ideological bubble. They're typically first to apply a label to a large group of people and then assume all the people with that label are the exact same. Your recent posting history here includes calling the entire European Union a "non-contributing toddler" to the world. Hmm.

Digging through my chat history to misrepresent something I've said only underscores my original point.
Post reply on HN