For copy-paste, you made it feel like a low-hanging fruit? Why don't AI agents have copy/paste tools?
Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
231–240 of 382 posts
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
What do you think was the reason that the bootcamp grads struggling to get better at what they do?
A computer science degree in most US colleges takes about 4 years of work. Boot camps try to cram that into 6 months. All the while many students have other full-time jobs. This is simply not enough training for the students to start solving complex real world problem. Even 4 years is not enough. Many companies were willing to hire fresh college grads in the hopes that they could solve relatively easy problems for a…
Where do your senior devs come from?
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#233Recently, I asked Codex CLI to refactor some HTML files. It didn't literally copy and pasted snippets here and there as I would have done myself, it rewrote them from memory, removing comments in the process. There was a section with 40 successive links with complex URLs. A few days later, just before deployment to production, I wanted to double check all 40 links. First one worked. Second one worked. Third one worke…
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#234Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#235Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had similar experience both in coding and in non-coding research questions. An LLM will do the first N right and fake its work on the rest. It even happens when asking an LLM to reformat a document, or asking it to do extra research to validate information. For example, before a recent trip to another city, I asked Gemini to prepare a list of brewery taprooms with certain information, and I discovered it had inc…
LLMs are not good at "cycles" - when you have to go over a list and do the same action on each item. It's like it has ADHD and forgets or gets distracted in the middle. And the reason for that is that LLMs don't have memory and process the tokens, so as they keep going over the list the context becomes bigger with more irrelevant information and they can lose the reason they are doing what they are doing.
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#236Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had similar experience both in coding and in non-coding research questions. An LLM will do the first N right and fake its work on the rest. It even happens when asking an LLM to reformat a document, or asking it to do extra research to validate information. For example, before a recent trip to another city, I asked Gemini to prepare a list of brewery taprooms with certain information, and I discovered it had inc…
LLMs are not good at "cycles" - when you have to go over a list and do the same action on each item. It's like it has ADHD and forgets or gets distracted in the middle. And the reason for that is that LLMs don't have memory and process the tokens, so as they keep going over the list the context becomes bigger with more irrelevant information and they can lose the reason they are doing what they are doing.
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
> About half of the code generated fake data rather than actually do anything with the system. All the time // fake data. in production this would be real data ... proceeds to write sometimes hundreds of lines of code to provide fake data
"hey claude, please remove the fake data and use the real data" "sure thing, I'll add logic to check if the real data exists and only use the fake data as a fallback in case the real data doesn't exist"
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#238Recently, I asked Codex CLI to refactor some HTML files. It didn't literally copy and pasted snippets here and there as I would have done myself, it rewrote them from memory, removing comments in the process. There was a section with 40 successive links with complex URLs. A few days later, just before deployment to production, I wanted to double check all 40 links. First one worked. Second one worked. Third one worke…
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#239Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've had similar experience both in coding and in non-coding research questions. An LLM will do the first N right and fake its work on the rest. It even happens when asking an LLM to reformat a document, or asking it to do extra research to validate information. For example, before a recent trip to another city, I asked Gemini to prepare a list of brewery taprooms with certain information, and I discovered it had inc…
LLMs are not good at "cycles" - when you have to go over a list and do the same action on each item. It's like it has ADHD and forgets or gets distracted in the middle. And the reason for that is that LLMs don't have memory and process the tokens, so as they keep going over the list the context becomes bigger with more irrelevant information and they can lose the reason they are doing what they are doing.
I imagine that the cost of saving & loading the current state must be prohibitively high for this to be a normal pattern, though.
Re: Two things LLM coding agents are still bad at
#240Recently, I asked Codex CLI to refactor some HTML files. It didn't literally copy and pasted snippets here and there as I would have done myself, it rewrote them from memory, removing comments in the process. There was a section with 40 successive links with complex URLs. A few days later, just before deployment to production, I wanted to double check all 40 links. First one worked. Second one worked. Third one worke…
Evals don't fix this.