I don't know what they've been training on but I just canceled claude for the second time. Besides the numerous UI bugs of the web interface, incessant flickerings, it has gotten weirdly super condescending and negative in a way I hadn't observed neither in the past nor with other llms. Probably that people accused it of being sycophantic and they have tried to adjust it but they didn't do it well. It'd rather critic…
If you don't like Claude's personallity, ask him to behave differently. It's common for me to periodically say 'don't be so sycophantic' and 'be more critical' when working on technical projects. In your case, try saying 'be nicer' or 'be more jovial'.
If you have a Claude account, they're going to train on your data moving forward
231–235 of 235 posts
Re: If you have a Claude account, they're going to train on your data moving forward
#232Re: If you have a Claude account, they're going to train on your data moving forward
#233Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed. Typically I would be against something like this, but in this case, have it.
How do you feel about this data being used to target advertising at you in the inevitable rush to monetize these AI products?
Re: If you have a Claude account, they're going to train on your data moving forward
#234Earlier quoted context omitted.
Okay, but "stealing" is also an oversimplification, to the point of absurdity. It makes no sense to put stuff up on the internet where it can freely be downloaded by anyone at any time, by people who are then free to do whatever they like with it on their own hardware, then complain that people have downloaded that stuff and done what they liked with it on their own hardware. "Having machines consume large volumes of…
Ok so if I publish under a license saying I don't allow for it to be used for AI do you believe they respect it? What word would you use to describe this violation? Go ahead throw up a robots.txt, throw up a license. You will be able to coax the "fair use" stochastic parrots to render it verbatim. Sam Altman and his ilk are exploiting the incredibly slow moving legal system to enrich themselves.
It's even worse than that, they don't even legally have to respect it if courts find it to be fair use, and so far they have. If it's fair use to train models on it, your license means nothing.
The only way to "win" is to not publish your code at all, anywhere.