Live data from Hacker News

YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

bbc.com

231–240 of 292 posts

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#231
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> thoughtfully polished > enhancing it with care I get what you’re going for with this comment, but it seamlessly anthropomorphizes what’s happening in a way that has the opposite impact I think. There is no thoughtfulness or care involved. Only algorithmic conformance to some non-human synthesis of the given style. The issue is not just about the words that come out the other end. The issue is the loss of the transm…

You do realize I just took parents comment and gave an AI the prompt to rewrite it by changing everything negative to a positive?

Thank you for dumping that load of excrement here. Maybe someone can use it as fertilizer.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#232
post #207
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The well is already poisoned. I'm refraining from hiring editors merely because I suspect there's a high chance they'll just use an LLM. All recent books I'm reading is with suspicion that they have been written by AI. However, polished to a point that we humans start to lose our unique tone is what style guides that go into the minutiae of comma placement try do do. And I'm currently reading a book I'm 100% sure has…

There's a YouTuber named Fil Henley ( https://www.youtube.com/@WingsOfPegasus ) who has been covering this for some years, now. Xe regularly comments on how universal application of pitch correction in post as an "industry standard" has dragged the great singers of yore down to the same level of mediocrity as everyone else. Xe also occasionally reminds people that, equal temperament being what it is, this pitch corre…

[deleted]

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#233
post #207
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The well is already poisoned. I'm refraining from hiring editors merely because I suspect there's a high chance they'll just use an LLM. All recent books I'm reading is with suspicion that they have been written by AI. However, polished to a point that we humans start to lose our unique tone is what style guides that go into the minutiae of comma placement try do do. And I'm currently reading a book I'm 100% sure has…

There's a YouTuber named Fil Henley ( https://www.youtube.com/@WingsOfPegasus ) who has been covering this for some years, now. Xe regularly comments on how universal application of pitch correction in post as an "industry standard" has dragged the great singers of yore down to the same level of mediocrity as everyone else. Xe also occasionally reminds people that, equal temperament being what it is, this pitch corre…

Why are you calling Fil Henley a "xe"? Misgendering a man as non-binary is still misgendering. Let's not normalize misgendering in any way. (And no, you don't get call misgendering a "stylistic choice")

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#234

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Again, this isn't GenAI . The idea of it being "without consent" is absurd. Your phone doesn't ask you for consent to apply smoothing to the Bayer filter, or denoising to your zoom. Sites don't ask you for consent to recompress your video. This is just computational image processing. Phones have been doing this stuff for many years now. This isn't adding new elements to a video. It's not adding body parts or changing…

> Again, this isn't GenAI. Yet.

How about we stick to the facts of what is actually happening?

I mean, I'm also not Brad Pitt. "Yet."

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

there is no way you aren't able to discern the obvious differences between physical labor such as digging a hole and something as innate to human nature as creativity. you realize just how hollow a set of matrix multiplications are when you try to "talk to it" for more than 3 minutes. the whole point of language is to talk to other people and to communicate ideas to them. that is something that requires a human facto…

you realize just how hollow a set of matrix multiplications are when you try to "talk to it" for more than 3 minutes. Then again, it only takes 2 minutes to come to that realization when talking with many humans.

So why are you wasting your precious comments on the hollow humans here? Leave us alone and talk to LLMs. No doubt they will tell you you’re absolutely right.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> that clearly look like AI slop That's not what AI slop means. There's no GenAI. I watched the video. It's literally just some mild sharpening in the side-by-side comparison.

Whatever youtube is doing adds a painted over effect that makes the video look like AI slop. They took a perfectly normal looking video, and made it look fake. As a viewer, if you can't tell or don't care... That's fine. For you. But at the very least, the creator should have a say.

I don't think you know what "AI slop" means.

It's not making the videos look fake, any more than your iPhone does. Most of what's shown in the example video, it might very well be phones applying the effect, not YouTube.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#237
post #207

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There's a YouTuber named Fil Henley ( https://www.youtube.com/@WingsOfPegasus ) who has been covering this for some years, now. Xe regularly comments on how universal application of pitch correction in post as an "industry standard" has dragged the great singers of yore down to the same level of mediocrity as everyone else. Xe also occasionally reminds people that, equal temperament being what it is, this pitch corre…

Why are you calling Fil Henley a "xe"? Misgendering a man as non-binary is still misgendering. Let's not normalize misgendering in any way. (And no, you don't get call misgendering a "stylistic choice")

He did it for attention. You giving him attention doesn’t help in any way.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#238

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The only way to know for sure that something was written by a human: It contains racism, or any other opinion AIs are forbidden to express. Now imagine the near future of the Internet, when all people have to adapt to that in order to not be dismissed as AI.

How naive. Grok generates racism as a service, and Elon does his best to tune it that way.

Well then we will have to fucking swear in everything we fucking write, to identify ourselves as humans, since AI doesn't like nasty language. And we should also insult other participants, since AI will almost never take an aggressive stance against people it is conversing with, you god damned piece of shit.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#239
post #194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes? Until content start being published elsewhere it's fair to say we are forced to go to YouTube to access it.

who's forcing you?

Everyone who put mandatory stuff on YouTube and only here. Two last examples I faced recently:

- Companies who put their product instruction manual exclusively on YouTube

- university curriculum who require you to watch contain that is on YouTube only.

Sure I'm free not to buy any manufactured products or not resume my studies, but it's like saying the Gulag was OK because people were free not to criticize Stalin.

Re: YouTube made AI enhancements to videos without warning or permission

#240

It was purely luck of the context that I noticed, but I received an email notification that someone had messaged me on LinkedIn via my gmail account. When this happens, the email contains the message contents. However, in this case the message contents did not match between the version within LinkedIn and the version presented in the email. Only two words were different, but that slight change made it even more pecul…

Maybe the sender edited the LinkedIn message? The email shows the original version, before the user edits.
Post reply on HN