Live data from Hacker News

Europe bets once again on RISC-V for supercomputing

theregister.com

231–233 of 233 posts

Re: Europe bets once again on RISC-V for supercomputing

#231
post #209
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s not a fair or reasonable thing to point out given that few countries at that time gave slaves or women voting rights. The U.S. was one of the first majority White countries to give Black men voting rights in 1870, after France did some time in late 1700s. Haiti was the first country to give all people, regardless of race, voting rights in 1804. I agree that the U.S. was really late to enter into women’s suffra…

So the vision included a tiny minority of land owners. General suffrage in 1789 was about 1 in 20 people, almost entirely white land owning men. 20 years later the vote was actually taken alway from many of the few black men who had it. White men still needed property. In parts of the US this property requirement lasted until the 1850s, and after that the requirement to be rich enough to pay taxes survived well into…

I don’t dispute anything you’re saying, I just don’t understand what frame of reference any leader or policymaker at that time could have used to do anything differently. What country at that time was some paragon of social justice or progressivism? I think the US founding fathers did pretty well for their time, when most countries in the world were part of empires, or were monarchies.

People are more socially progressive now because of the passage of time, and the accumulation of sociopolitical observances it allowed. The average person now is only less of a brute because of the cultural training they’ve experienced, but it’s not something to be taken for granted.

In general, there are very few people (sages) who are more moral, ethical or curious than the average person of their own time. Often times their behavior makes them look like a loser or a weirdo to their contemporaries or society.

Re: Europe bets once again on RISC-V for supercomputing

#232
post #231
post #209

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So the vision included a tiny minority of land owners. General suffrage in 1789 was about 1 in 20 people, almost entirely white land owning men. 20 years later the vote was actually taken alway from many of the few black men who had it. White men still needed property. In parts of the US this property requirement lasted until the 1850s, and after that the requirement to be rich enough to pay taxes survived well into…

I don’t dispute anything you’re saying, I just don’t understand what frame of reference any leader or policymaker at that time could have used to do anything differently. What country at that time was some paragon of social justice or progressivism? I think the US founding fathers did pretty well for their time, when most countries in the world were part of empires, or were monarchies. People are more socially progre…

Your statement was “The US founding fathers included everyone in their vision”

It isn’t true. And the idolisation some people have for wealthy white landowners from 250 years ago is just weird. Judge the world on today

Re: Europe bets once again on RISC-V for supercomputing

#233
post #232
post #231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don’t dispute anything you’re saying, I just don’t understand what frame of reference any leader or policymaker at that time could have used to do anything differently. What country at that time was some paragon of social justice or progressivism? I think the US founding fathers did pretty well for their time, when most countries in the world were part of empires, or were monarchies. People are more socially progre…

Your statement was “The US founding fathers included everyone in their vision” It isn’t true. And the idolisation some people have for wealthy white landowners from 250 years ago is just weird. Judge the world on today

I am judging it from today—if the founding fathers developed that framework today, Enlightenment ideals would rationally lead them to include everyone based on the progress of social thought up to this point. I won’t hold their lack of social progress against them because they were pioneers for their time.
Post reply on HN