Live data from Hacker News

Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

news.ycombinator.com

231–240 of 347 posts

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#231
post #135

Come join the Firefox revolution!

Uh, YT on FF is unusable now. They'll show the "adblockers not allowed" message if you have Ghostery enabled. Even if you disable that, they will add tons of artificial lag on things like key input, clicks and screen draw speed. I know it's artificial because it worked fine for years and then one day....

Works fine for me (FF + uBO on Linux).

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#232
post #196
post #158

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If I recall correctly only till June 2025, did they change the date?

I'm not sure but a lot of people hypothesize that they will have to keep this feature for enterprise customers (not for UBO but other custom enterprise extensions that use manifest v2)

they can easily just blacklist ubo if they really wanted to remove it. And they can make it plausibly deniable - by blacklisting the extension id of anything that is in the chrome extension store that originally had manifestV2 (which will have some collateral damage, but obviously google doesn't care).

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#233
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ladybird is the UK term for what Americans call Ladybugs

Then it is going to be adopted everywhere fine except the UK.

I don't see why it wouldn't. Ladybird Books has been around for 157 years:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladybird_Books

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#234
post #89

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't have to use the crypto features.

when the defense of a project is that you can turn off the bad features, you aren't really making a chase better than say chrome or anything else. A product built on trust, shouldn't involve having to go turn off untrustworthy elements.

You don't need to turn off "bad features". Just don't use them. Just like the rest of the browser features you don't use, which there are many of.

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#236

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IMO it’s a matter of principle. Mozilla is supposed to be a non-profit that exists to support the development of a FOSS browser and its related projects. Over the years it seems like they’ve strayed from this mission, behaving more and more like the big corporations they claim not to be like

> IMO it’s a matter of principle. Eh? So Chrome should be used because Google has no principles? Here's the Mozilla Manifesto: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/manifesto/details/ They explicitly state that they want the internet to benefit the public good as well as commercial use. Principle number 9 is: "Commercial involvement in the development of the internet brings many benefits; a balance between commercial p…

No, I never said anywhere that chrome should be used. As a matter of fact, I use Firefox myself. My original observation was that Mozilla presents itself as a benevolent non-profit yet behaves like soulless for-profit tech company, abandoning valuable FOSS initiatives and carelessly laying off employees, all while increasing executive pay

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#237
post #91
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, I don't get all this fuss. I mean, if you block ads then do you think Chrome will also stop reporting to the mothership? Of course not. Use Firefox and simple be done with all this hoohah.

Blocking malvertisements is a matter of safety , I personally find the privacy aspect secondary to that.

For me primarily a matter of convenience: I don't want to be inconvenienced by ads. Secondly and thirdly safety and privacy.

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#238
post #206

I find this whole thing frustrating. Chrome is going full on user hostile. But, most people use it, so webpages "just work." It's also reasonably good on battery use and memory (as of late 2024 - it's come a long way). Safari is resource efficient but has very few browser extensions, and sometimes webpages just don't work correctly with it. Firefox has uBlock but has noticeably worse battery life, and does not honor…

For me Firefox with uBlock works just fine. It boggles my mind that so many people are willing to put up with all these ads. Unfortunately, most people don't even know that ad blockers are a thing. I cringe everytime I see a friend of mine opening a youtube video and wait until they can skip the ad. I aleays tell them about Firefox + uBlock Origin, but they typically just shrug it off... Never underestimate the power of inertia.

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#239
post #135

Come join the Firefox revolution!

Uh, YT on FF is unusable now. They'll show the "adblockers not allowed" message if you have Ghostery enabled. Even if you disable that, they will add tons of artificial lag on things like key input, clicks and screen draw speed. I know it's artificial because it worked fine for years and then one day....

YT on Firefox + uBlock Origin works just fine for me, both on desktop and mobile!

Re: Tell HN: I just updated my wife's Chrome, and uBlock is no longer supported

#240

Come join the Firefox revolution!

Joined the revolution 20 years ago and never looked back!

BTW, Firefox still has over 10% market share in German speaking countries, compared to 3% worldwide. To the rest of the world: stop being lazy and try other browsers!

Post reply on HN