Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

bsky.app

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 274 posts

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#231

Post by Teever »

Dweller1622 wrote: post #215
Teever wrote: post #200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's more nuanced than you think. How do you feel about 17 year olds collecting nudes of 14 year olds to gawk at and bully them over?

The supposition that this is “more nuanced than I think” given the particular example you’ve chosen strikes me as quite bizarre. Does “17 year olds collecting nudes of 14 year olds to gawk at and bully them over” not strike you as abusive and/or exploitative? Because it certainly does to me. I think you’ve chosen to interpret my post in an excessively literal manner (i.e only adults abuse or exploit teenagers) rather…

I'm glad that you agree that selfies shared between teens are not intrinsically innocent and that adults entering into the picture is not the only thing to worry about in this situation.

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#232

Post by johnnyanmac »

amatecha wrote: post #159
johnnyanmac wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure if it tracks given that the founder himself more or less got ousted from his platform. I don't exactly think the current owners keep the servers up in good faith.

Maybe this lends weight to the idea that the strongest social network is decentralized and not reliant on a single point of ownership/control/failure? :)

Strongest, yes. Most profitable, no.

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#233

Post by policky »

DrillShopper wrote: post #219
policky wrote: post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.

[flagged]

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#234

Post by astrange »

wannacboatmovie wrote: post #185
kelnos wrote: post #151

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We live in a weird world where a 2% margin in a handful of states counts as a "resounding defeat". Losing the Senate was expected. The House was perhaps less of a toss up than the presidential election itself, but this outcome isn't really a surprise.

She also lost the popular vote by nearly 3M - more than the entire population of 19 different European countries - and he carried more states than his opponent 4 years ago, and more than Bush did in both 2000 & 2004. It is by all conventional and accepted definitions a resounding defeat.

It doesn't matter who wins the popular vote. Since you don't get anything for it, the campaigns don't try to increase it. I'm not getting rallies or ads in California.

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#235

Post by astrange »

northhanover wrote: post #193
astrange wrote: post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Household income is up, but individual income is down, by the same source: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEPAINUSA672N Indeed it's down a bit. The reason I didn't link it is that I think household income matters more than personal income, because it's more relevant to paying for the big expenses like the household itself, but it depends how people share expenses. US household sizes historically never grow thou…

How could individual income shrink if household income increased and the households didn’t increase in size? Someone is lying.

The medians are at different positions, I think.

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#236

Post by thaw24612107 »

DrillShopper wrote: post #219
policky wrote: post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.

[flagged]

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#237

Post by thaw24612107 »

DrillShopper wrote: post #219
policky wrote: post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.

[flagged]

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#238

Post by astrange »

Dweller1622 wrote: post #189
astrange wrote: post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I mean, if you expand the acronym it isn't euphemistic at all! I think it's actually a little too specific. It's trying to exclude "innocent" things like selfies or "simulated" things like drawings, but those are just as illegal in some or all countries.

> It's trying to exclude "innocent" things like selfies or "simulated" things like drawings, but those are just as illegal in some or all countries. Selfies shared between teenagers are innocent! When an adult enters the picture is when it becomes a problem, because yes: it’s abuse and exploitation that we’re objecting to. Unless we think morality is a question of aesthetics, then yes, this also means drawings are no…

Because the production process didn't involve abuse, but it's still illegal to produce them. The distribution of them does though.

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#239

Post by DrillShopper »

policky wrote: post #233
DrillShopper wrote: post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.

[flagged]

Oh so you're TERF aligned. Got it got it

Re: We’re receiving about 3,000 reports/hour

#240

Post by slater »

thaw24612107 wrote: post #237
DrillShopper wrote: post #219

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is kind of difficult to do in a vacuum; let's assume those are the only comments that these accounts have posted. "sorry, but no to all of this: males cannot be lesbians" banned for transphobia for misgendering the second poster. Clear cut, get the fuck out if here. No action for first and second poster.

[flagged]

Take your bigotry somewhere else.
Post reply on HN