Live data from Hacker News

CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

clownstrike.lol

231–240 of 243 posts

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#231
Fair parody user script response:

  // ==UserScript==
  // @name       Clownin'
  // @namespace  Clown Division
  // @include    *
  // @version    0.0.1
  // @author     AHOHNMYC
  // ==/UserScript==
  
  /* This is also parody, like one in https://clownstrike.lol/crowdmad */
  [
    {'original': 'crowdstrike', 'parody': 'ClownStrike'},
  ].forEach(clown => {
    tw = document.createTreeWalker(document, NodeFilter.SHOW_TEXT, el => el.textContent.toLowerCase().includes(clown['original']));
    while(tw.nextNode()) tw.currentNode.textContent = tw.currentNode.textContent.replaceAll(new RegExp(clown['original'], 'ig'), clown['parody'])
  });

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The offending TLD here is .lol, which is not one of the TLDs they support. This would not have helped in this instance. https://globalblock.co/included-extensions/ I'm also seeing much higher pricing: https://www.101domain.com/global-block.htm

GlobalBlock is owned by GoDaddy, and pretty much covers the TLDs/extensions that are owned by GoDaddy Registry. NameBlock is a separate company than GlobalBlock, and covers a different set of TLDs/extensions.

I didn't grab the pricing info for NameBlock because it requires you to sign an NDA to even see the pricing. I also don't see a list of TLDs they support.

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#233
post #227
post #220

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That is perhaps true in some Common Law jurisdictions (US?), but not for much of the world, including some Common Law jurisdiction such as the UK and Ireland. The first name I use daily is different from what's on my passport and I've gotten into trouble with this in both the UK and Ireland.

I'm not sure on what we disagree. It is my understanding that what I said applies to the UK and Ireland, there are formal ways to register a name change, but it is not necessary and it is possible to "change" your name simply by having people refer to you using the new name. As I mentioned, this will cause some difficulty with people and organisations who assume names are unique and immutable(c.f. [0]), but that's no…

> there are formal ways to register a name change, but it is not necessary and it is possible to "change" your name simply by having people refer to you using the new name.

Try opening a bank account like that. I can guarantee you it's not going to work; they will want to see a passport and proof of address with exactly the same name. I've been rejected by banks just because the utility bill shortened my second middle name to just "P".

This seems true for pretty anything of substance: government, tax, banks, insurance, health care, things like that. I'm not a lawyer and don't know how it works according to the letter of the law, but de-facto, you will have a "legal name".

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#234
post #201

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Sure, they're all equal shades of shitty, but that's a different issue. You can choose which digital shotgun is strapped to your organizational forehead.

I’ll take several different shotguns each strapped to a different limb please.

[flagged]

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I certainly don't want to claim everyone on Hacker News is a high powered CISO making EDR purchasing decisions for their Fortune 500 company or whatever, but I feel like there are enough people with actual influence who read this site that if I was a security company (or any tech company) I wouldn't want front page stories that make me look petty about getting rightly clowned on after a fuck-up of galactic proportion…

I mean... is THIS going to be the thing to tip you over the edge? Not last month's shenanigans, but THIS?

There is the difference that this mistake is much simpler. A lot of business people will understand that having a litigation team without even the most basic Streisand filter is a newbie mistake. How they should have/could have protected themselves against the big breakdown is a lot more complicated, even for tech people.

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#236
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s quite surprising to me that they thought to do that, although maybe I’m just naive. I wonder what other parody names and altered versions they own…

CSCs whole deal is securing domain names for huge brands, they probably have people whose job involves thinking of derogatory domains like that so they can grab them pre-emptively. The people behind the .sucks TLD turned that into an incredible grift, they charge an exorbitant amount (about $300 a year) because they know every big brand will buy brand.sucks no matter what.

.EXPOSED operates on the same premise. And a lot of these gTLDs are run by groups of the same shady guys based out of Cyprus and Hong Kong.

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#238
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> So yes, it is illegal to rhyme trademarks. Do you have any real life examples of that?

Do you also want me to prove the sky is blue and that sex causes babies? It's trademark basics that it applies to anything that can reasonably be confused with it. But please, try starting up Goodle Search or Matflix Streaming and let us know how that went for you.

I believe this is a reasonable reply. I also believe it's strange you get downvoted!

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#239
post #233
post #227

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure on what we disagree. It is my understanding that what I said applies to the UK and Ireland, there are formal ways to register a name change, but it is not necessary and it is possible to "change" your name simply by having people refer to you using the new name. As I mentioned, this will cause some difficulty with people and organisations who assume names are unique and immutable(c.f. [0]), but that's no…

> there are formal ways to register a name change, but it is not necessary and it is possible to "change" your name simply by having people refer to you using the new name. Try opening a bank account like that. I can guarantee you it's not going to work; they will want to see a passport and proof of address with exactly the same name. I've been rejected by banks just because the utility bill shortened my second middl…

I'm sorry you had trouble from your bank, I know the requirements are annoying. I have indeed opened bank accounts including in the UK and Ireland in names other than my passport name. It's easier once you have some piece of paper with a new name on it to get another.

Re: CrowdStrike representatives issue trademark infringement notice to ClownStrike

#240
post #224
post #223

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If clownstrike is taken, maybe they can try clownstruck?

Would I get sued if I made a company called clownstruck? There's quite a lot of difference, unless they really identify with the sentiment.

you can get sued if you use their logo/trademark/symbol to create your trademark!
Post reply on HN