Earlier quoted context omitted.
Guaranteed that marketers are salivating at the idea of eye tracking on apps and website. It's an amazing feature that absolutely needs to be gatekept.
I wonder if it'll use the same architecture as visionOS; where the vision tracking events and UI affordances are processed and composited out-of-process; with the app never seeing them.
Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
231–240 of 300 posts
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#232Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wonder if it'll use the same architecture as visionOS; where the vision tracking events and UI affordances are processed and composited out-of-process; with the app never seeing them.
That's probably how it'll go because it's the path of least resistance. A button will already have a listener for tap, so the OS translates the vision tracking into a "tap" and triggers the relevant code. There's no point telling the app about vision tracking because apps wouldn't already have a handler for that event. And for privacy reasons, there's no need to start now.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#233I wonder what new voices will be added to VoiceOver? We blind people never, ever thought Eloquence, an old TTS engine from 20 years ago now, would ever come to iOS. And yet, here it is in iOS 17. I wouldn't be surprised to see DecTalk, or more Siri voices. More Braille features is amazing, and they even mentioned the Mac! VoiceOver for Mac is notoriously never given as much love as VoiceOver for iOS is, so most blind…
Maybe it's not feasible for you but if you're ever near an Apple Store, you could definitely call them and ask whether they have an accessibility expert you could talk to. In the Barcelona Apple Store for example, there is a blind employee who is an expert at using Apple's accessibility features on all their devices. He loves explaining his tips and tricks to anyone who needs to.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#234They really earn consumer loyalty.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#235It's funny how the post is about enhanced surveillance technology and the text sentiment of the comment thread is overwhelmingly positive. Surveillance technology: >:( Surveillance technology with the word "accessibility" in the title: :)
an iphone constantly broadcasts your location to third parties, can deduce where you work and live, understands the unique shape of your face, has a built-in microphone and multiple kinds of cameras, stores all of your conversations, stores all of your photos, stores your health information, can figure out when you go to bed.. all on a completely closed and proprietary operating system.
it’s like asking “why hasn’t anyone mentioned that we’re all using a website right now”
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#236I'm not fully against it, but it's good to keep in mind the implications.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#237Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some people never really learn how to use one-pedal driving, so they end up just going back and forth between accelerating and decelerating. That'll make me motion sick in a hurry, and I bet that is fairly universal (among people prone to motion sickness in cars, that is). So in that sense, any EV or hybrid is potentially a problem, depending on the driver.
Ah yes, I never get motion sick, except for when I'm in the car with just such a driver: A person with sine-foot.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#238Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#239This is why Apple is the best. They’ll make features like this because it’s the right thing to do, even if it won’t really make any difference to 99.99% of their customers. They really earn consumer loyalty.
Re: Apple announces new accessibility features, including eye tracking
#240Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same, a family member send a photo while I was driving and over Carplay it was described fairly accurately.
It’s sometimes awesome, and often extremely basic. “Contact sent you a picture of a group of people at an airport”. Amazing. “Contact sent you a screenshot of a social media post”. Useless. We know iOS can select text in pictures, so Siri can clearly read it. It knows it’s SoMe, so why not give me the headline?