Live data from Hacker News

Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

washingtonpost.com

231–240 of 288 posts

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#231
post #162

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess it was originally done this way because in the past people actually had some semblance of privacy and the government didn't actually know a great deal about people's income. Eventually, privacy was eroded away year after year to the point where the government now knows an extreme amount about each citizen. I guess I'd refrain the question - instead of asking why do we need to do taxes when the government know…

> instead of asking why do we need to do taxes when the government knows everything about us that they could do it for us They cannot do everyone's taxes since what they know about many individuals is incomplete. > should we really have that little privacy? Put that way, the answer is no. On the other hand, virtually everyone demands services from their government and very few people want those services to be transac…

> since what they know about many individuals is incomplete

No, for most individuals it is complete. Most people don’t own stocks directly (only an estimated 21% do)[1], and the ones who don’t are not probable to deal with complexly taxable transactions as the norm.

[1] https://www.axios.com/2023/10/18/percentage-americans-own-st...

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#232
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Technically, you can vote for anybody you like, including yourself or Santa Claus. But no, LaRouche was never going to make it.

Voting for one of two parties compresses the will of the people to a single bit.

Even worse: individual states are on a campaign (nationally) to ban ranked-choice voting [1] among their constituencies (e.g. Tennessee recently did so, to prevent a Memphis-area jurisdiction from implementing fairer voting).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant-runoff_voting

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#233
post #216

Earlier quoted context omitted.

None of which apply to the vast majority of filers. Nobody is saying filing taxes should never be necessary. Only that it shouldn’t be necessary for most people. The flow should be… Employer and financial institutions send info to IRS (they mostly do already). Then, in January, IRS sends a “Is this correct?” notice to residents. If correct, no action is needed. If not correct, then make adjustments.

How would the residents verify the amount on the notice is correct? It sounds like the residents would have to do their taxes to verify the amount on the notice....

It switches the labor from manual input of every line to cross referencing, which is significantly less work

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#234

It’s amazing that 54% of adults in the United States have a literacy below 6th grade level, but it is expected for the same population to have the financial literacy to file their taxes accurately. Going further, the IRS already knows the details of most people’s taxes before they file, yet everyone is expected to complete what amounts to a complex task for many people. I cannot fathom why it is still done this way.

There used to be the 1040ez which is a one page form, but I guess that was discontinued.

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#235
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It’s amazing that 54% of adults in the United States have a literacy below 6th grade level, but... Stop there! Really? "6th grade" is age eleven? That is mind blowing!

I wonder if they went through school and just didn't retain it, or if they were simply not educated at all.

Just wait until you see how many people don’t read another book for the rest of their lives after high school/college.

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#236
post #192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Don't you need to specifically authorize someone to use that to get your salary?

Not if that someone is Equifax itself or any of its hackers.

Sure, any payroll company (or their hackers) knows your salary.

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#237
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s amazing how much of an idiot I felt like when we hired a babysitter for two days a week for about a year and then it came time to do things properly regarding taxes and her wages. I understand why it’s important to do it properly (for the employee’s benefit) but when I tried to look into what we had to do, as technically her employer, and it was nearly impossible for me to figure out what we had to do and then h…

Non-US citizen here: you have to declare what you paid the nanny to the IRS? Where I'm from, only the receiving end of the money needs to declare how much they earned. The only reason we file expenses is for tax deductions. The US tax system has always seemed so hostilely complex to me.

[deleted]

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#238
post #2

I did my Canadian taxes for me and my spouse on a free filing site last night, in less than two hours, for $0. Everything was prefilled; practically the only thing I had to fix was to convert an imported investment statement from USD to CAD, and double check that everything was accurate. I welcome the Americans to the delightful convenience of hassle-free taxes!

My employer submitted all my T4 information to the CRA. My investment services submitted all my tax forms to the CRA. UFile downloaded everything for me, autofilled my return, submitted it online back to the CRA and charged me $30 for the privilege. LMAO

That's why I use one of the free options. Both GenuTax and WealthsimpleTax are free to use and user-friendly, albeit in different ways. What extra thing does UFile do to justify its price?

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#239
post #7
post #2

I did my Canadian taxes for me and my spouse on a free filing site last night, in less than two hours, for $0. Everything was prefilled; practically the only thing I had to fix was to convert an imported investment statement from USD to CAD, and double check that everything was accurate. I welcome the Americans to the delightful convenience of hassle-free taxes!

So this free site was not run by the government of Canada. Are you concerned that you just gave all of your personal and financial data to a third party site? If you’re not paying anything they’re likely data mining your data and selling it. And we haven’t even talked about the security implications of trusting your data to these companies.

Due to a similar approach to privacy, I use GenuTax, which is a Windows program not a website, and does not send anything anywhere except to the tax authority. Not everyone cares about this aspect of privacy and security, but for those who do, there are options, both free (GenuTax) and paid (StudioTax, etc.).

Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site

#240
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't have to do any of that. Its their job to report income and pay taxes. Withholdings are a "convenience" not a requirement. Furthermore you weren't their employer, they provided a service to you.

The IRS seems to think a babysitter is a household employee [1], which makes mkrisc a household employer and subject to various requirements. Withholding for federal income tax is voluntary, but employment tax isn't assuming the total pay is over the thresholds. [1] https://www.irs.gov/publications/p926#en_US_2024_publink1000...

Wow. I did not know that.

It's likely 90% of the population don't follow this tax law.

Post reply on HN