Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

231–240 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#231

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

On reflection this thread is pretty clearly of general interest and my comment was more jargon that language, I hang out in ML zones too much. For a broad introduction to the field Karpathy's YouTube series is about as good as it gets. If you've got a pretty solid grasp of attention architectures and want a lively overview of stuff that's gone from secret to a huge deal recently I like this treatment as a light but p…

I'm trying to go deeper, I'd be curious to know what other ML zones you keep track of?

- I know r/LocalLlama, huggingface's Daily Papers and TheBloke. Most of what Youtube throws at me is horrific clickbait. I feel like there are probably whole communities I'm missing out on.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#233
I want ChatGPT for Family.

The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it.

Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You’re leaving money on the table!

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#234
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe in the AI Twittersphere it started with sama, but it’s been becoming common in Gen Z culture for a few years now. If you look up popular bands at the moment, you’ll find a decent chunk of them only use lowercase in their band and song names.

It is a weird trend.

The phone only auto capitalizes the first letter of a sentence. If you end up changing it sometimes it doesn't get replaced with a capital. If you get frustrated with autocorrect features, often modern phones don't allow you to select which features to turn off and you're forced to turn everything off, at least that's how it was during the time i learned to type with the phone. I'm not gen z but I'd say it has a lot to do with it being much more cumbersome to capitalize a letter on the phone than the keyboard.

Plus, there's also the aesthetic, for a while we did it out of angst and to show we weren't all that wrapped up in the modern sensibilities. It seems like the situation as society moved forward may have only gotten worse for this.

If you're confused about something gen z does, it's either:

1) they're teenagers and grew up with phones, get with the times old man

2) a large corporation that didn't have a monolopy on communication (maybe basically everything else too) when you grew up now does and its an artifact of being forced to grow in that world

3) global warming is scary as shit, no one in power seems to give a shit, economies are crumbling, we're temporarily losing the worldwide battle for continued democracy, why wont they stop the war, school shootings, nuclear destruction isn't too close but doesn't look like it's getting farther away, etc etc etc. Basically, "have you seen the world? Why are you even trying, let alone the teenagers today?" type thing.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#235
post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

Ok, big noob question I never understood how to capitalize headlines correctly. Can someone eli5 ?:D

Like a big chunk of the language, English capitalisation is nonsensical and descriptivist. Different organisations have different rules just like different audiences have different expectations, and there is no single way to capitalise words in titles.

I'm with the parent comment on this one: for this particular headline it makes sense to lowercase "teams", since the HN audience will tend to correlate the uppercase version with the incorrect meaning of the headline.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#236

I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…

Can't you use the same account on multiple phones though? I thought this is a no brainer.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#237

OpenAI understand their tech lead isn't a sustainable moat, so are going for network effects. Similar to Slack Connect (shared channels).

I heard the no moat theory before and I don't get it. The open source models are about a year or two behind the latest ChatGPT in terms of quality. That means companies will always be willing to pay premium to use ChatGPT and not rely on open source. So even if/when Google and Apple (and perhaps Meta) catch up in terms of A.I quality, there's still so much money to be made for OpenAI. One interesting by product of late game capitalism like this is as more and more jobs get destroyed due to A.I, so will subscriptions. So it might be a mixed bag in the end for the tech giants if there's no real economy to buy the products anymore, but we're a long way from there.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#238

I want ChatGPT for Family. The free version gets a lot of use around here but the most powerful feature is the ability to search the web, which is only available to paid users. I pay $20/month for myself and I’d happily pay a bit more for the whole family, but not $20/month per person - it adds up. Family members end up asking to borrow my phone a lot to use it. Give me a 3-4 person plan that costs $30-$40/month. You…

I'm certain that they will soon release anything that promises more subscriptions. ChatGPT for Family, ChatGPT for Gov, and so on...

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#239
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is literally nothing on that page (nor in the linked help article that describes how to export data) that says how to tell them to "not use my data for training" and not loose history at the least. If you know more about this feature please do tell.

> ' There is literally nothing on that page that says how to tell them to "not use my data for training"... ' You can opt out of ChatGPT using your conversations for future training, without disabling any features like convo history. Either some browser plug-in like an adblock is hiding the button from you, or you're not noticing and clicking it (I'm guessing the former [1]). For me, on iPhone, there's a black button…

Never knew about this link, I have requested not to train on my data but can we even confirm if they will honor it?

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#240

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Here's a glossary to understand this post: - mixtral-8x7 or 8x7: Open source model by Mistral AI. - Dolphin: An uncensored version of the mistral model - 3.5-turbo: GPT-3.5 Turbo, the cheapest API from OpenAI - 4-series preview OR "4.5 preview": GPT-4 Turbo, the most capable API from OpenAI - mistral-medium: A new model by Mistral AI that they are only serving through AI. It's in private beta and there's a waiting li…

As someone who follows AI pretty closely, this was unbelievably helpful in understanding the parent post. It's crazy how much there is to keep on top of if you don't want to fall behind everything that is going on in AI at the moment.
Post reply on HN