Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

AI real-time human full-body photo generator

generated.photos

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

231–240 of 421 posts

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#231

Post by wkat4242 »

bruce511 wrote: post #219
ThrowAway1922A wrote: post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> What exactly is the argument against AI-generated child porn? Currently? The fact that all the models need training data and the law will see that as victimizing the people who were used in the data set be they adults of children. Overall? The fact that it's disgusting and pedophiles deserve things which I can say IRL and everyone agrees with, but on HN will get me banned. Many countries ban underage anime porn too…

It's natural (normal) to think child point is disgusting. But its not hard to find many other sexual acts that at least some people, if not most people, find disgusting. So I'm not sure disgust is a useful criteria here. Most of what makes pedophilia so disgusting is the fact that a child is involved. Remove the child from the equation and it's more in line with other sex preferences. People can't really control thei…

> You mention children being off limits. In other societies homosexuality is still criminal. Even where it is legal many consider it "off limits" or "disgusting". Laws, and emotions, in this space are not always logical.

In fact in a lot of those countries where fully consensual homosexuality is highly illegal, marrying (with all its implications) what we would consider a child is legal and "normal" and so is forced/arranged marriage (again with all that implies). I'm really lucky to have grown up here.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#232

Post by rerdavies »

smeej wrote: post #24

Why is it impossible to generate a male model wearing anything other than rolled denim jean shorts? I've tried things like "long pants" or "ankle-length pants," but I cannot get it to stop putting them all in denim shorts!

Go for crotchless leggings. That worked for me. :-P

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#233

Post by jug »

hn_throwaway_99 wrote: post #98

I get that most of these are hilarious (this is my favorite comment on HN in some time, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37239909 ). But still, I find this incredibly frightening. These are only going to get better. Does anyone doubt that in a couple years time (if that) we'll be able to put the image of any known public person into whatever generated photo we want, which would be indistinguishable from reality?…

https://getimg.ai already lets you train on submitted photos and then generate using various AI models. This tech is commonly called DreamBooth. There are clauses against misuse of course. The obvious one being creeps using photos of girls they know and then using an NSFW model with it.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#234

Post by userbinator »

dotancohen wrote: post #155
mrguyorama wrote: post #131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

I don't know if the thing in the crotch is a penis or a scrotum, but it is definitely NSFW: https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIill... My prompt was simply "Standing in front of a rocket.".

It's neither, because this AI doesn't care for gender norms. /s

That looks more like a machine, an android perhaps, than an actual human.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#235

Post by pezezin »

I know that currently AI is the hot topic, but if you want to generate pictures of well-known objects like humans, why not just render a 3D model of a human? Something like Poser (the software) is way more efficient than any GAN or diffusion model.

But Poser is 28 years old now, I guess it doesn't attract sweet VC money.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#236

Post by nomdep »

mrguyorama wrote: post #131
dragonwriter wrote: post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you're wondering how it's so fast and cheap and they can generate variants so easily I assume its cheap because they are burning money to build a business, its not fast at all, and the quality... sucks. > And if you're wondering how it can look so good I’m not. I'm wondering why they’re trying to get people to use something worse than using a decent photorealistic SD1.5-based checkpoint with some basic prompt te…

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

An AI-generated image is just a drawing, not a real human.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#237

Post by blitz_skull »

wizofaus wrote: post #188
blitz_skull wrote: post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably moral depravity if I had to guess. Not sure why we even need “an argument” against it. It’s pretty self-evidently wrong.

What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia?

You’re suggesting that perhaps allowing people to explore an urge that should be fought and suppressed might dissuade them from pushing that urge further resulting in real-world action? Fascinating, do tell me more.

Blatant disregard for children aside, the larger issue here is the presupposition that we should someone permit all urges. Not every thought that passes through your brain should be “explored”; some thing are just bad and should be fought.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#239

Post by _tom_ »

rerdavies wrote: post #228

I couldn't help noticing that half the female poses are seriously CFM ("Come hither"), whereas the male poses are The Thinker, or Man-spreading, or other things that manly men do. But then I tried generating some male images. Turns out that The Thinker can be seriously CFM as well. For some reason, all the images I have generated so far are unexpectedly sexualized even I when i try to give it completely benign prompt…

I tried to add more clothing, both with the prompt, and with the clothing tab. Got the same tiny costume each time. Trying to generate D&D character, got chippendale.

Re: AI real-time human full-body photo generator

#240

Post by _tom_ »

system2 wrote: post #66
smeej wrote: post #24

Why is it impossible to generate a male model wearing anything other than rolled denim jean shorts? I've tried things like "long pants" or "ankle-length pants," but I cannot get it to stop putting them all in denim shorts!

There is a clothing tab which you select whatever you want. I think description doesn't override it.

It doesn't work, either.
Post reply on HN