Live data from Hacker News

Jellyfin: Free software media system

github.com

231–240 of 406 posts

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#231
post #13

For years I just wanted a good user experience playing video files from my MBP to a TV, I spent a lot of money (on NAS, chromecasts etc), used a lot of software with objectively terrible user experiences (Plex I'm looking firmly at you). Finally, I discovered the combination of Jellyfin and Infuse App. It works really well.

[dead]

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#232
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

ExFAT and NTFS are in the Linux kernel already. I don't think they'd need to license them at this point.

In the kernel doesn't mean you have a license to use it.

Technically yes, but companies can join the OIN for free and ship it for free.

Lots of companies are in that list (https://openinventionnetwork.com/community-alphabetical/) including Google, Sony, Amazon, and hundreds of other companies.

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#233
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the kernel doesn't mean you have a license to use it.

I think the GPL license kind of implies that you do have a license to use it.

That's GPLv3, GPLv2 (which the exFAT code was licensed under) doesn't include patent rights.

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#234
post #39

I tried it, but ended up just using file shares. The biggest issue for me is that it does not automatically recognize many movies by their short names instead linking to some obscure thing with a similar name. For instance, since files can not have colon in the name, and many movies do, it gets confused about the title. Another similar issue is about shows and how it recognizes their folder and file structures. In th…

Another "just share files" user checking in. There are dozens of us! Old school NFS/SMB has "just worked" for me for decades. It's free, uses almost zero server resources, is easy to add content to (just copy a file), and it isn't going to change out from under you when its developer decides to monetize you. If you really must have a pretty front-end for your TV or whatever, there's Kodi, which is also old-school, fr…

[dead]

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#235

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not sure that ensuring BSD support is a requirement of well-engineered software. You're welcome to start your own project vs. complaining about Jellyfin, a free and open project. I just wouldn't confuse their product focus with badly engineered software on account of it using a modern language. Anyway, there is Docker; You could spend the rest of your life shaking your fist, or you could just run it via Docker an…

It's not just on BSDs that these breakages occur. The forums are full of reports, many of which occur on Linux. And yes, I've actually considered starting a project of my own. The main thing that gives me pause is not writing the CRUD and server bits but learning ins and outs of the absolute beast that is FFMPEG.

With gstreamer and it's webrtcbin stuff, it's incredibly easy to hack something together that would get an MVP going.

I'd love to see a modular, but integrated approach, and one that lets me treat the media server itself as fungible. I want a sqlite database that is easily syncable/backup/restorable, I want a small Rust component that does media scanning and writes metadata to the database, and another small server component that has "storage" plugins for accessing the actual media and then uses gstreamer to "simul-cast" it to any WebRTC capable client.

Imagine being able to WHIP your media into an OBS session, or have it cast side-by-side with a webcam feed to an RPi hooked up to a TV. Etc.

If I could clone myself, this is the project Clone #1 would work on.

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#237
post #65

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Add prowlarr and bazarr for the full win.

Prowlarr is a deitysend. Instead of having to configure indexers in Sonarr, it does the heavy lifting for you. Goes in, configures an indexer, and that's your search setup done.

I would also prefer to manage my download clients from prowlarr but for some reason the maintainers are conceptually opposed to that.

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#239

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This alone, finally got me and my husband to switch. Jellyfin is FANTASTIC, and I wrote a simple script with ChatGPT to help with tagging and metadata for our home collection.

What does it do exactly? I'm always always looking to improve my jellyfin setup

corrects metadata, and adds some custom stuff like our own reviews from our family google account spreadsheet.

Re: Jellyfin: Free software media system

#240
post #229

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use the full stack and all very grateful for the products. The remaining annoyances are: - lack of multi language support - there is no connection between the systems when you want to remove a movie (you remove it in one place and everything knows about that and acts accordingly) - I still did not make to fully grasp how and where to say "I do not want this particular release". I think I saw that in radarr but it n…

Yeah I was initially surprised when learning about the *arr stack for the first time, as my intuition was very insistently telling me: "I must be gettint it wrong, these ought to be all a single service!!" They all definitely feel like small parts of a single package, don't look like they merit being their own thing. But it's not my thing, so what do I know.

The architecture of how they work together is a lot more functional than lots of the software at Fortune 500 companies
Post reply on HN